Search:

well it would be good practice for some of us ...:D

Nope - I always said it required that in this application, I have always said that the context determines the interpretation.....

provide the quote where I said that it must only be used in a...

no, not if you get it right... you quite entitled to get it right, if you keep getting it right eventually you become an expert, if you don't you should probably learn to rely on one more often. ...

lemme see... you can't rebutt any of my argument, people you talk to is your "resource" to form opinion, you clearly can't work out that words used in dictionary definitions are not singular,...

haven't given any legal advice fella.. just basic communication skills...

you can discount my opinion as much as you want, provided of course you can provide a real argument to do so. Thats...

great job actually....

she's impressive, shows an ability to cut throught the BS and willingness to accept the scruitiny that comes with...

might pay to try and keep her in the job....

If you want to have any sort of impact, how about not using language that is inflammatory or ruins our credibility...

You want to talk to people that make laws? quit the emotional exageration and...

oh sorry, I must have missed the bit in the dictionary that said I should give all due consideration to what you think....

so just below this text is a picture of me giving all due...

gadge u could have a very big head, what has that got to do with the size of your IQ? thats not how it works.. lol

didn't say they were incorrect, you just don't appear to understand them - the...

Thats not pleasant..

But they don't know you, would you suggest that the police don't investigate those situations?

Domestic situations, families neighbours are the majority cause of serious...

see there u go again.... not understanding the arguments, or in your case apparently not even seeing the arguments...its pretty obvious, well it is if this actually what you do....

First don't try...

no wonder you don't get it gadg.. u can't even pick up sarcasm.... its not even close...lol

don't worry about expecting better from me... you have to understand the arguments before you can...

its a conspiracy....

Mate the executive is cabinet. or more particularly the formed govt. ffs everyone got an opinion even if they just dont know what they just dont know

Wheres the agreement to do anything "bad"

you might want to ignore that but you can't actually...

if that was your intention, that just leaves you being mistaken then doesn't it.. because every person in the street is going to think that that a conspiracy involves illegality...

The general...

I can read fine Gadget, can u not understand...?

Words can be used anywhere, and the meaning might even pass the standard of the ill-informed, but that doesn't make it correct or even appropriate....

Mauser...

I don't agree that you do understand...

the police's business is interpreting law... they have to maintain their own budgets but its their call. They are always asking the court for...

Gadget.... so you cant find undermine or disadvantage then? To use it in the way it has been here is just hyperbole. And you know it...

Mauser... you don't understand the system... the court...

you wanna contribute... work on identifying the issue before bothering to analyse criminal conspiracy.... its not the point

otherwise piss off... you don't get to decide what other people want...

you all seem to want to watch.... lol

except that they don't both fit... and that is the argument. Your meaning fits in a metaphoric sense to non legal situations, but no its not appropriate in this one.

we don't talk about a cabinet...

context is not just the phraseology used.... it is also the situation that it is being applied to..... you don't get out of it that easily...

the implication was obvious... and so was the...

I am wondering whether that might be the angle?