Don't discount the hornady 58gr either for goats at reduced velocities in a 243.
I've even run them over a full cartridge of tailboss but can't remember what velocity I got.
Don't discount the hornady 58gr either for goats at reduced velocities in a 243.
I've even run them over a full cartridge of tailboss but can't remember what velocity I got.
@GWH Are you sure you aren't looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist?. I have set up a .243 for my kids. Both are small for their age and weigh a whopping 35-40kg. I fitted a short stock and 6" bipod +suppressor. They have to shoot prone as can't hold the gun up either. They are both happy to shoot it with full power loads and have successfully taken a deer each. I understand your thinking with the low power loads but you could argue that full power loads allow for a bit more error in bullet placement from a young shooter?
Sent from my SM-G525F using Tapatalk
Last edited by hunter Al.7mm08; 02-11-2022 at 05:50 PM.
Simples. Less powder equals:
less bang
Less recoil
Hunt safe, look after the bush & plug more pests. The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
A bit more bang is better.
Yeah I get ya.
Rifle fit certainly has a lot to do with it, my lad didn't much like shooting the reduced loads in the 243 (stock was too long), I did a similar reduced load for a model 7 6.5CM with 123gr eldms, that rifle has a shorter lop, and he enjoys shooting that, and can hit a 3 inch bull at 400 yards with it.
So, yep you may we'll be right.
Bookmarks