I have measured the max jam length for the accubonds, that length was 3.366” so I seated the bullets at 3.350”. .2gr jumps in powder is how you’d go from here? I’ll give that a go. Cheers!Quote:
Originally Posted by chainsaw
Printable View
I have measured the max jam length for the accubonds, that length was 3.366” so I seated the bullets at 3.350”. .2gr jumps in powder is how you’d go from here? I’ll give that a go. Cheers!Quote:
Originally Posted by chainsaw
Why did you not start with the projectile seated to manufacturers specs? They spend millions and hours working with highly sophisticated equipment
and some first time loader thinks they know better, I have been hand loading since 1969 and still start with manufacturers seating depth when trying
a new projectile, Always start with getting the powder charge sorted out first, Your loads are stringing vertical which is usually a sign of bad ignition
horizontal stringing is a bad hold, Seat the projectiles to Nosler's specs start with their start load shoot three shot groups in .5 grain steps until you find
the most accurate powder charge forget about velocity until you have the rifle grouping a 2960fps hit is better than a 3100fps miss.
That is a good point. I was under the impression that seating closer to the lands was better seen as the factory loads are set to encompass all make and models. CheersQuote:
Originally Posted by shooternz
Greetings Again 7RMBoy,
The Nosler data is the hottest I have seen listed currently so would suggest not going above 63 grains. The data is the same as was listed in Nosler's No 1 manual from 1976 with slight changes in velocity. I suspect the loads crowd the 52,000 CUP or 60,000 PSI limit pretty hard. IMR4831 was introduced in the early 1970's, about the time that load data started to be pressure tested. All new handloaders start out infected with a degree of velocititis (a burning desire to achieve the maximum velocity possible at any cost) but most recover over time. 62.5 grains of IMR4831 interpolates to 2,990 fps. If you can chronograph that load it will give you an idea of pressure. If the velocity is close then pressure will be too.
If you are concerned over getting that last erosive foot per second I suggest a little exercise. Construct a couple of drop charts, each with the Accubond zeroed at 200 metres, but with one for 2,800 fps and the other 3,000 fps. this will show the difference between a hot load and one less so.
I also would not read too much into the accuracy of a single group for a load. You could shoot your set of loads again and get quite different results. That's just the way loads are. To me the 62.5 grain load looks promising so I would retest that one with a couple more groups before I change it much. A couple of clicks left on the scope and a few loads and you are ready for hunting. Further development can continue between hunts.
Regards Grandpamac.
Have you got a reloading manual and given it a good thorough read?
Not trying to be overly critical, but your approach seems quite cavalier and it looks like you've made a few too many assumptions along the way with your reloading.
Might just want to slow down a bit and get someone to sanity check what you're doing.
Hey Granpamac,Quote:
Originally Posted by grandpamac
Just whipped up a ballistics chart and noted that the difference isn’t that major really. There is a 6inch drop difference at 500m and roughly a 200fps and 200ftlb difference between the 2800fps and 3000fps.
To be fair the velocity doesn’t really bother me aslong as the bullets group well and will preform at distances out to the 5-600m mark. Which both of those examples would.
Thanks for the reply
Hey Pommy,Quote:
Originally Posted by Pommy
I don’t own a manual yet, have been getting information off of the bullet manufacturers websites and the likes. I think you’re probably right with that assumption. I do have a couple people i can talk to and get them to verify my methods.
Cheers
There is nothing wrong with using reloading manuals from the manufacturers website. Far more likely to be current than some hardcopies you find laying about.
2 quick questions.
You mentioned the IMR you have has been around since your Dad was reloading. How long ago was that and how was it stored?
And, how good a shot are you? No disrespect intended but I have seen people shoot with my rifle/reloads, that are genuine .5 combos, and only just get their group on an A4 page at 100m. Basically, are you good enough to be able to tell if it's the ammo or you?
I'm impressed by your ability to accept all inputs without adverse reaction. Well done & hang in there.
The AB is a great pill for close up ranges (0- 300 or 350 yrd) and larger game, but at 5 - 600 yards you'll find its probably too tough, being a bonded projectile) & may pencil thru an animal with out doing much internal damage (unless you strike bone). Animal in this case may escape a long way before succumbing. Effect may be more exaggerated on smaller/lighter game. For longer range you'd be better of with more frangible pill like the old 162gn AMAX, now ELDM or X. or 160gn Sierra TMK's, or Berger 168 VLD hunting or 168 Classic Hunter. As a side note, Nosler typically overstate their BC's.
or the cheaper and easier to get nosler ballistic tip...which SHOULD pretty much be swappable with no change to anything...AB for close BT for longer...and yes agree its nice to see someone take advice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proudkiwi
Hey,
I cannot say for certain how many years it has been sitting for, but it was in screw lid plastic containers and still smells fine according to dad. That is one thing i am weary of though as i’m sure you are implying that it could potentially have gone off or not be as reliable as it once was.
I am by no means a professional shooter, but the shots I took were off a very steady sandbag rest and felt good. I did notice i was flinching slighly at times but stopped to settle a bit before shooting. Definitely not going to be missing the paper at 100m though ;),
Thanks, may aswell take any advice given seen as it’s not hard to know more or have more experience in this field than me so I’m always all ears. Keen to learn.Quote:
Originally Posted by chainsaw
I did have quite a look at projectiles before buying and a couple people i work with raved about the Accubonds. Not saying it’s the perfect projectile but I have about 70 left so may aswell try to make them work for now. Question; you noted the ELDM, are match bullets still alright for hunting purposes? What is the difference between a match bullet like the ELDM compared to the X?
Cheers
I'll answer that one for you 7RM
There is no one bullet for everything.
Up close and with large heavy game or shooting bone you need a tougher bullet.
Out past ????? varyies with velocity 200mtr, or smaller or soft skinned game you need a bullet that is softer and opens up more readily.
Hence some people opt to use the ELDX at short range and the ELDM at long range. (NOTE THE LOAD DATA IS QUITE DIFFERENT)
The ELDX has a thicker jacket so opens up slower, or in other words requires more resistance from the target to open up. ie on a side on shot at a red spiker at 300 mtrs just passing through the ribs and a lung or 2 you will get a slow kill.
The ELDM on the other hand has a thin jacket and will open up violently and do far more tissue damage for a fast kill.
But at short range on a large red Stag a shoulder hit may leave a large crater and a wounded deer that may get away, while the ELDX will penetrate right through.
Horses for courses, knowing your anatomy, and knowing your bullet and placement.
However some of us get too worked up over this which bullet thing. A standard cup and lead core soft point has worked for 100 years.
You have some great advice above and look to be taking it in. Don't go chasing top velocity, give yourself some room for errors and your barrels will last a lot longer. Mostly I reload for 2 rifles, 1 a very strong custom bolt action. Book max is 46.7 gr and while I did work up to that load to check I had some head room left, my standard load is 46.0 gr for just over 3000 fps as that gives me all they energy I need out further than I'm happy shooting.
The other is a lever action and on that I typically stop 1-2 gr under book.
Also some bullets will catch you out. This year I had some Speer 75gr HP left over from my Dad that I wanted to use up in the 243. I just went straight to a mid range load thinking I had a strong action all good. Turns out it was not all good, I was lucky really as nothing bad happened but about 1 in 3 I got an ejector swipe mark.
Mentioned to Dad that I had an issue with them and he straight away asked Pressure ???, Turns out that's why he had not used them up in the 1970's.
ALWAYS START AT BOOK MINIMUM.
Z
i just started using eldx , from sst, certainly pretty sweet for long range but no where as good as yer accubond up close.
pending on the price over there, thats sorta my major limiting factor on Accubonds and the like, so ELDX are pre good, however man plain jane Interlocks are guna do the same as he eldx / (SST particularly) out to 5 or 600m before the shape lets down its flight path.. so for the cheaper Same Same, im guna be loading interlocks for punchign paper an the odd deer, an load up some Woodleih 160s (performa same as your Accubond) for sambar hunting strictly out to 500m...
check out Woodleigh prices man, 160gr PPSN is a go-er, you guys could get away with a 140gr for Tahr and Reds....fast.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZQLewis
Very good reply there. Cheers for explaining.