Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Originally Posted by gimp

Can you explain what value you are contributing here?

I was pointing out the irony of shooting 55 rounds to "prove" the feasibility of a "simplified" load development without taking into account individual circumstances, especially when "testing" a rifle/powder/bullet combination that essentially produces a valid "short range" hunting load for all the charge weights that you have tested.

What i did not intend is harm your ego, which seems to have happened... sorry about that!