Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 204
Like Tree277Likes

Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Threaded View

  1. #29
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,994
    Quote Originally Posted by Ground Control View Post
    Well I shot those seating depth test rounds and the conclusion is ………

    I need to get better at my shooting form and trigger skills
    All shot very well ( 17mm / 15mm /18mm ) at 100 yrds with no outstanding best or worst when you take into account my shooting ability and low number of rounds ( 2 x 3 shot groups for each load , those measurements are an average of the two groups )
    I’ve come to the conclusion lately that if your Rifle likes the bullet / powder combo it doesn’t matter much about the other stuff .
    I’m just going to load up 50 rounds ( of the 15mm load , not because I strongly feel it’s better , but hey why not ) and zero the Rifle with 3 x 10 shot groups and go kill stuff with the other 20 .
    I don’t shoot at distances greater than 300 yrds with this Rifle and trying to achieve a genuine 0.5 moa gun is a waste of time when with minimal development I’m confident that 10 round groups will be hovering around the 1 moa + or - a fraction with any of the combo’s tried already
    Thanks for reporting back. Can you post the targets?

    I don't think it's terribly surprising - even if one is a believer in seating depth changing precision, the TMK is a tangent ogive bullet and not believed to be sensitive.

    I've posted before that the order of effect size when changing variables, in my view, is something like this (gaps indicative of relative importance) :

    Barrel quality (get a good barrel, properly chambered)



    Bullet quality

    Powder choice and how it interacts with specific bullet and barrel
    Brass quality











    --------unproven to be an effect-------------------
    Any tuning of powder charge or seating depth






    I'm not sure I believe there is such a thing as a genuine 0.5MOA rifle - using the definition of precision that refers to the full dispersion of the true cone of fire. I have yet to see any evidence that such a thing exists. Certainly in practical terms, the effect size of shooter error swamps rifle precision in the noise and no-one could actually take advantage of it in a hunting scenario

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. A novel approach to Load Development
    By Puffin in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-08-2018, 11:36 AM
  3. General approach to powder selection for a new load
    By MGNZ in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-11-2017, 03:29 PM
  4. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM
  5. OCW Load Testing
    By The Bloke in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 20-08-2014, 09:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!