Thread: FWF Ban for Non Attendance

Originally Posted by stagstalker

Yea I can understand that and I have heard a share of such stories. I don’t doubt there’s some bullshit involved, there is in everything everywhere. I just feel that the bullshit/person/issue itself is what should be targeted/resolved as opposed to threatening to do something that screws over everyone without actually directly addressing the issue/failing itself.

If old mate is out of line then work to put that line straight, don’t go and screw with all the other good parts of the organisation whilst screwing fellow hunters at the same time. I imagine we are on the same page and it’s just a case of trying to communicate through words on a keyboard.

This is my exact thoughts. There can be issues in any organisation but this tendency to go straight to you did something I don't like screw you and everyone your associated with. Issue is all of a sudden you've told everyone to go fuck themselves.
You see it in politics that "won't" work with National, Labour, act, whoever because they do this once but realistically you've got to pick one and the only way to have any of them improve is tell them good shot when they do something you like and tell them to short there shit out when they don't.

In this situation I feel that maybe repremanding this bloke for inappropriate misuse of power, potentially sort the system to avoid this in future with clearer rules ie state you have to go to the briefing regardless as the intent is to have everyone give it their best go. No making up rules on the spot. If someone does something then add it to the rules to stop it happening again but this time just leave it.