Originally Posted by
Flyblown
The problem for us is that all risk matrices that are used to assess hunting are likely to attach a “moderate” or “medium” risk to the activity, because the highest “consequence” outcome is at the worst level - “fatality” - even when the “likelihood” is assessed at its lowest level, i.e. “very unlikely”.
So when government looks for low risk activities, hunting probably doesn’t fall into this category when a standard risk assessment process is applied to outdoor activities.