Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 216
Like Tree288Likes

Thread: the OFF TOPIC to Stags shot 21 (discussion of wild animal management)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Would the following work as a proposal: Trophy producing areas are identified - for example the Rakaia to Whitcomb pass. To hunt these blocks a special 'Managed Trophy Animal' annual permit is required costing fifty dollars. The permit must be carried and hunting in the area without a permit will incur a fine of five thousand dollars. Strict conditions will apply to the types of animals taken and those holding a permit will be required to remove a take of hinds.
    I believe that the average meat hunter would not bother when other open access areas are available.
    Chur Bay likes this.

  2. #2
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    10,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post
    Would the following work as a proposal: Trophy producing areas are identified - for example the Rakaia to Whitcomb pass. To hunt these blocks a special 'Managed Trophy Animal' annual permit is required costing fifty dollars. The permit must be carried and hunting in the area without a permit will incur a fine of five thousand dollars. Strict conditions will apply to the types of animals taken and those holding a permit will be required to remove a take of hinds.
    I believe that the average meat hunter would not bother when other open access areas are available.


    It could work, and is actually probably technically possible under current legislation, if:

    You included an evidence based management plan to improve ecological outcomes over the current management, and it passed scrutiny by DOCs technical advisors, it would likely need to include detail of management tools, expected results supported by evidence, monitoring to determine outcomes, contingencies if management tools failed to meet outcomes, etc

    The legal aspects of the plan passed scrutiny (And probably legal challenge from Green Groups) under variously the Wild Animal Control Act, the Conservation Act, the Reserves Act, various Conservation Management Strategies, etc.

    Due process was followed in implementing it allowing consultation with the correct parties, and there was adequate social license to manage an area with the word "trophy" within a city block of the name

    You could get buy in from the right people of influence to actually agree to implement it

    It could generate enough revenue to cover the cost of administering, ensuring compliance, etc

    There weren't any risks to DOC legally, ecologically, financially, or in terms of losing control of management if it failed

    Commercial interests (WARO) weren't influential enough to shut it down




    I still think that starting from a trophy based perspective is putting the cart before the horse.
    Moa Hunter likes this.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    2,398
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    It could work, and is actually probably technically possible under current legislation, if:

    You included an evidence based management plan to improve ecological outcomes over the current management, and it passed scrutiny by DOCs technical advisors, it would likely need to include detail of management tools, expected results supported by evidence, monitoring to determine outcomes, contingencies if management tools failed to meet outcomes, etc

    The legal aspects of the plan passed scrutiny (And probably legal challenge from Green Groups) under variously the Wild Animal Control Act, the Conservation Act, the Reserves Act, various Conservation Management strategies, etc.

    Due process was followed in implementing it allowing consolation with the correct parties, and there was adequate social license to manage an area with the word "trophy" within a city block of the name

    You could get buy in from the right people of influence to actually agree to implement it

    It could generate enough revenue to cover the cost of administering, ensuring compliance, etc

    There weren't any risks to DOC legally, ecologically, financially, or in terms of losing control of management if it failed

    Commercial interests (WARO) weren't influential enough to shut it down




    I still think that starting from a trophy based perspective is putting the cart before the horse.
    Agree with this however I think again the issue of enforcement rises it's head once again as well as the dirty word trophy. But I think its another idea to add to the piles of potentials if we can solve some problems.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Wild animal attack NZ!
    By MB in forum Other outdoors, sports, huts and tracks
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-09-2022, 03:42 PM
  2. 2020 SHOT STAGS
    By bigbear in forum Hunting
    Replies: 287
    Last Post: 19-08-2021, 07:49 PM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 22-02-2020, 08:00 PM
  4. Stags Shot 2018
    By Shootm in forum Hunting
    Replies: 302
    Last Post: 12-10-2018, 07:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!