South island roar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by R93

We the public do not own the animals on private or public land so it is not theft. It is illegal hunting.

---

They are, while on private or public land, owned my the private owner/occupier and the crown respectively and it is classed as theft.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gadgetman

They are, while on private or public land, owned my the private owner/occupier and the crown respectively and it is classed as theft.

---

Pretty sure the crown owns/controls all the animals not private land owners.

Only stock purchased by said land holder are owned.

Happy to be corrected.

If so why are illegal hunters not charged with theft as well?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by R93

Pretty sure the crown owns/controls all the animals not private land owners.

Only stock purchased by said land holder are owned.

Happy to be corrected.

If so why are illegal hunters not charged with theft as well?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

---

New rules there Dave.
Deer in your paddock you own it mate.
If i come shoot that deer its no different to me shooting that sheep you have hiding under the house.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BRADS

New rules there Dave.
Deer in your paddock you own it mate.
If i come shoot that deer its no different to me shooting that sheep you have hiding under the house.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

---

Yeah fair enough. As I said I was happy to be corrected.😆

I don't own that ewe mate. You have no idea how many people I share her with,
she is a promiscuous wee thing😆

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Didn't mean to offend you Dave.

His convictions have been well documented, there is no intention to smear all helo's with the same brush.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crnkin

Didn't mean to offend you Dave.

His convictions have been well documented, there is no intention to smear all helo's with the same brush.

---

Ironically He got off One of them because It had been Posted all over Social Media before it got to Court .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crnkin

Didn't mean to offend you Dave.

His convictions have been well documented, there is no intention to smear all helo's with the same brush.

---

I am not offended by anyone mate.

I just get annoyed that what is imo a relatively minor issue in the grand scheme of things.
Can have other people wishing for the culprits demise or at least labelled for life like they committed the crime of the century.
































Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I have no problem with WARO, as long as its legal. Your point of view seems to be that WARO operators are some kind of charity that we all should be donating our RHA's too, on top of their concessions.

But as long as we agree that it is a crime, and that the perpetrator of a crime is a criminal. That didn't seem to be your point of view a page earlier.


Let Sydney decide. :)