Thread: Thar extermination

Someone said to me a while ago why don't you hunters fight fire with fire? I said what do you mean? Their reply was aren't they trying to save the forests and animals. I said yes but in a deluded way with no accountability. They said what would happen if there was nothing to protect? What do you mean I enquired. Well say if the forest was say to have a fire or animals removed they would have no reason to protect anything. I said that's a bit extreme and unlikely to happen. They pointed out that perhaps since they take no consideration for our sport or interests you could do the same to them. Or at least point out to them that there is direct measures. They also pointed out that doc has admitted to knowingly causing the death of birds etc with 1080. Why has there been no convictions as isn't it against the law? This was from some non hunting people. I guess at the end of the day you can only reason with reasonable people. History is litered with those that needed other means to stop them. Are we heading down the same road?