Thread: We could have been hunting under level 4 afterall

Originally Posted by 257weatherby

@Max Headroom has a perspective. That perspective is based on what we have learned re The Crown Law Office, I agree with Max.

Comrade Adern says "this"
Crown Law Office says "that"

Which one are you gonna believe?.............

Like I said. Both views are legitimately held and the Court is about to decide. And Max's is equally as legitimate too.
The Government don't make decisions in a vacuum and will be well informed but could be wrong. So could Crown law. The Court will decide. If the Gov's interpretation and approach is upheld, it means they acted lawfully - and then lingering dissatisfaction about the Gov can be decided at the ballot box. That's cool, because thats how democracy works.

Until the Court decides, the claims here that the Gov has acted unlawfully is simply wishful thinking. But, if through the Court or parliament scrutiny its revealed that the Gov has deceived us or wilfully acted ultra vires I will be pretty pissed, in spite of believing they have mostly taken the correct approaches.