Thread: Burris signature vs vx3hd

Hi interested to hear thoughts on the Burris signature 2-10 I like the vx3hd 3.5-10 but keen to try the Burris cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Had a few 3-10 signature, always rated them, with old age more than creeping up needed the AO.

Good warrentee, really like my 2-10x42 veracity FFP.
Z

The burris has a huge eyepiece which can make them a bit fiddly with mounting, sometimes need a higher ring to clear the bolt handle

My eyes had saw more of a yellow tinge on the Burris, wheras the Leupold popped more and was a truer colour.

However the price of the Burris kind of negates the tinge. Would go with the burris based on price to features but if youve already got the VX3 stay with it.

I have a 3 to 15 sig burris. Great scope, bought off the back of Thars review a few years back. To my eyes, the burris is clear and I prefer it to the vx3 glass myself. In comparison its not far behind my vx5. The vx3 wins in weight and being more svelte. Maybe have a look at the vixen range, you might be surprised. Optics are so personal based on age, stage, eye pref etc. Good luck

The illuminated 3-15 is ridiculously big and had to get higher rings as ryan said