Thread: A class Thumbhole stocks , what do you prefer

Exactly, your stock is compliant.

I probably didn't articulate my original statement well. I see it could be read as a question or otherwise.
My point was about the law rather than criticism of your product (which I think looks very good), sorry for any confusion.

I fail to see the advantage of having people retro fit stocks/grips to be compliant with the law, when the compliant options are basically the same thing for all other intents and purposes.
Seems pointless.
The intent of the law to me is to restrict/classify the rifle based on the pistol grip, however, physically join that exact same A2 grip to the rear stock and its now compliant.

I agree with a higher security requirement for an MSSAs, I'm even ok with their registration. Other than that, I see them as just another firearm that any licenced 'fit and proper' person should be able to enjoy for their chosen discipline of our sport.

Sorry to the OP for getting their thread off topic and many thanks to Glu & Digit for giving NZ shooters options.

[QUOTE=Glu;226547]

Originally Posted by Moutere

Doesn't that servo one make an ass of the intent of the law.QUOTE]

Why ?.

The GC moulds a houge to an A2 stock and we mould an A2 grip to a tube stock , is there a difference . Our stock follows what is outlined as an A-cat compliant stock . You cannot remove the grip from the stock without hacksawing the linking support .