They just really screwed up with the aesthetics of the 2.5-20. Man it’s not pretty to look at and what a pain having to raise it so much higher above the comb on a rail to make it fit. That and the weight aside, she is spot on! I went for the 4-32 F2 due to those reasons although in line with what Ryan is saying i’m not sure yet that I am convinced. In my 22 years of hunting only once have I seen a scope fail on a trip due to a knock so i’m not necessarily sold on the requirement for the extra weight. I’ll give it some more time on the hill before I make any further judgement.
Bookmarks