So I'm probably going to regret asking this, and no doubt you'll all make fun of an old guy (well 55 isn't young anymore but I can still stagger up hills with a pack for a deer or tahr) anyhow . . .
I have a bunch of lightweight rifles around the 6.5 lbs scoped mark, and I have a heavy rifle (Ruger PR) that is just under 12 lbs scoped and bipod(ed), and yes I've carried it to nearly 2000 metres with only a few groans (mainly from the hung-over young fella I was dragging up the hill, name suppressed to protect the guilty).
The Ruger shoots phenomenally well as a 6.5 Creedmoor, and is a good long range rifle by any definition but sometimes I feel the need for something a little more sophisticated - yes I'm a Mauser snob!
So - I have a brand new FN action, a nice walnut Slee classic style stock (his Rigby pattern) and a calibre in mind (no I'm not saying what, but I already have the chambered barrel blank so thats that).
The big question, what is the optimum all up weight, and why for a long range rifle for the NZ high country - should I be aiming for 9 lbs, 10 or more ?? Give me a barrel profile too if you like.




7Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote
and if it's under 24 inches it will be a waste, you will need a standard sporter #2 at least for 4 or 5 shots at Tahr so that's about 3 lbs plus the FN action and a walnut stock plus scopes, bases etc you wont get under 9 lb anyway.
Remember the bigger the hole the less the barrel weighs with standard profiles, this is often forgotten when talking a #2 or #3. I've got a 24.5" fluted #4 6.5 barrel on my T3 and it's under 9lb dressed in standard stock, DPT Suppressor & Z5 scope.


Bookmarks