Thread: Pard vs Pulsar

While it is possible to use a clip on NV without parallax adjustment on your scope it's certainly no where near as clean and your range is limited. I would actually steer away from a dedicated NV scope as they have a much more limited zoom range than traditional scopes, if you're at relatively close range it'd be good, but I can count points on stags out to 600m with my clip on with an external torch which you definitely couldn't do with a dedicated NV scope

The new Arken Zulus might change your mind on what’s possible with digital at longer range.

I have to agree having seen the videos tahr has posted taken with one both day and night that's serious competition for conventional optics at a similar price, and that's ignoring the added benefits of extended twilight and actual NV.

Originally Posted by Marty Henry

I have to agree having seen the videos tahr has posted taken with one both day and night that's serious competition for conventional optics at a similar price, and that's ignoring the added benefits of extended twilight and actual NV.

…and laser range finder and ballistics calculator. The future is pretty much here.

If you’re talking handhelds then the PARD takes the cake over the Pulsar in the same price bracket all day long IMO. The 18650 batteries is a big bonus too.