Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Scope for a .338 edge

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,468
    dirty old nxs would do the trick but if money is no issue.....

  2. #17
    Member camo wsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    1,858
    Quote Originally Posted by PerazziSC3 View Post
    dirty old nxs would do the trick but if money is no issue.....
    The price difference isn't huge between the atacr and I'd rather not regret being tight
    And not getting it

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    1,649
    So FFP vs SFP is basically where this discussion is at for a NF ATARC vs a Kahles K624i. I have a K624i and have not used a ATARC.
    And you want it as a hunting rifle primarily.

    I would recommend with all things being equal you go with FFP for the simple reason that the reticle marks are a constant angular measurement throughout the power range – i.e. the definition of FFP. In my opinion this has a few advantages of SFP:
    Depending on how well you handle recoil the higher magnification scopes can make target acquisition tricky, meaning you may need to adjust the zoom to get back on target – you will still be able to know the correction off the reticle at any power (assuming you see the impact) with FFP.
    In lower light conditions it may be an advantage to drop the scope magnification to give you a brighter view – when you do this with FFP the reticle is still constant.
    If you do not dial the windage and just use the reticle the sub-tensions are constant throughout the power range.
    Overall it simplifies the thinking and makes corrections easy to measure.

    The biggest problem I see with FFP is the reticle may be “thick” at higher powers and “thin” at lower powers. I have not found this to be a problem with my K624i with MSR reticle but others mention it. I have and do use my K624i at low and high magnification in field target shoots with positional shooting and short range targets. With your 338 Edge how likely is it you will have a need for the lower magnifications?

    Either way both are high end scopes that will serve you very well. SFP is not a problem you can't think your way out of anyway

  4. #19
    Member camo wsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    1,858
    Thanks for that gillie that's exactly my thoughts on the two
    In reality I doubt I will be using the scope on the lower powers
    As it is for a long range rifle like you say, the msr reticle is the one
    That I would pick as well if I went that way. Probably not a bad
    Decision to be having to make I suppose

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Edge Powders: What Are You Using?
    By alcesgigas in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 16-07-2014, 06:23 AM
  2. Rem 700 SA 338 Edge
    By Kiwi Greg in forum Terminator Products
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21-02-2014, 08:24 AM
  3. 26" Edge
    By Kiwi Greg in forum Terminator Products
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-05-2013, 09:57 PM
  4. t3 .300 win mag to .338 edge conversion
    By ARdave in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 02-07-2012, 10:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!