Scope Dilemma - Burris/Delta/Steiner - Thoughts and input welcomed
Just setting up my first hunting rifle (308) for bush/open spaces and looking at a variety of scopes, (preferably illuminated) for sub $1.5k and thus are considering either the Burris Signature HD 3-15 x 44, Delta Titanium 2.5 - 15 x 50 (or 56) and Steiner Predator 4 (imported from US) 2.5 - 10 x 42.
Had also looked at Leupold Vx5 HD (firedot) and Zeiss but may be a tad outside of the budget.
Anyway, from those who have undoubtedly used them all before, would be interested in getting some feedback and thoughts please as they all seem to have pros and cons with respect to Weight, Objective lens, tube size etc.
Additionally, would be good to get some insight also please on what would be the main factor affecting scope choice for hunting and field use.
thanks.
You owe it to yourself to look at Meopta
Truly hard to beat the value that you get in Meopta's line of scopes. In your budget there are a lot of options, byt as others have said, there is no substitue for trigger time. Take a look at Meopta's ZD/MeoTac line, great features and on sale right now. I have both. Also, The Optika5/6 line is tough to beat for its features and quality. I use the Optika5 4-20 Z Plus RD on my hunting .308. I dial in the drops using Strelok Pro and I'm good to go. My buddies and I have whacked 8 inch steel plates past 600 yards using the drops. Again, no substitute for practice. Anyway, Check out Meopta scopes.