Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Bagheera

Thread: Scope Field of View vs Eye Relief

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,968

    Scope Field of View vs Eye Relief

    It looks to me as if a bigger field of view can be obtained by using a shorter eye relief.
    It's sort of intuitive.
    Likewise, you might get more FOV by making the ocular lens diameter bigger.
    If you could compromise on eye relief you could offer a better field of view.
    This might be the case with rimfire shooting and specially with airguns.
    In fact, one manufacturer makes an airgun scope with essentially no eye relief - the "Touch" !
    Its field of view is twice that of a comparable model with a more normal eye relief.
    Compared to the entry level Vantage SF, shortening the eye relief from 89mm to 76mm in the Airmax SF increases the FOV by 40%. Bringing the eye relief down to 30mm (like binoculars) in the Airmax 30 Touch more than doubles the field of view.

    Vantage SF 3-12x44 89mm 10.2 - 2.6 m@100m
    Airmax SF 3-12x40 76mm 14.6 - 3.6 m@100m
    Airmax Touch 3-12x32 30mm 21.3 - 6.1 m@100m

    Name:  Hawke scope table.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  33.8 KB
    Moa Hunter likes this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!