Hey fellows
When I wind the elevation turret to the top a black ring encroaches on the bottom of the view...
When I wind the elevation turret all the way down it does but from the top...
The scope is FFP
Thoughts? :)Attachment 34354
Attachment 34355
Printable View
Hey fellows
When I wind the elevation turret to the top a black ring encroaches on the bottom of the view...
When I wind the elevation turret all the way down it does but from the top...
The scope is FFP
Thoughts? :)Attachment 34354
Attachment 34355
erector mechanism moving? what is the scope.
Just a Nightforce...
It would appear that either
The recticle is moving more than intended/designed.
The recticle is no longer in the correct part of the path of light from front to back and as they are cone shaped from the lenses they get smaller/bigger.
I apologise for my compleat lack of technical terms and spelling/grammer
Haha yeah... Na I think you are right
Over $7000 ... I would expect...well... Not this!
A, don't use it at the extreme top or bottom of its range.
B, get a SFP scope :)
try different parallax/diopter settings? try a S&B?
Yup firstly Its not mine and I certainly wouldn't pay that kinda money for one.
Greg I'm with you on the SFP mate :)
But "don't use it on the end of its range" I mean really hahaha
It's a top end Nightforce lol ... "Yeah it's good as long as you don't dial up or down too much... Then you can't see thru it properly"
I was under the impression that FFP was the way to go? Is there a different school of thought? (Genuinely interested in what people have to say about this)Quote:
get a SFP scope
I guess what I'm interested in knowing is ... Is this faulty or as Greg suggested just don't dial that far?
Jesus, $7000 wasn't a typo/joke?!
FFP is the way to go. Reticle valid on any magnification, sensible reticle design is adequately thick/thin on any magnification, i.e. S&B P4F. No reason to choose SFP over FFP except cost at which point lol considering the money we waste on this retarded shit, custom rifles etc