Give me tikka or sako any day.
Bang for buck and generally pretty good out of the box.
Tried a few others and now got a cuboard full of the above.
Sent from my SM-A556E using Tapatalk
My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!
In my experience the Tikka’s are probably the best in that price bracket for overall out of the box accuracy.
Sure there are exceptions from all brands , but when you roll the dice on a new unproven rifle my money goes on the Tikka ( again with the caveat of price bracket )
Also there is now a plethora of aftermarket parts and accessories for Tikka’s that you can just plug and play with .
I own four Tikka’s of different calibres and to be honest they would be the last to be evicted from my safe .
FALL IN LOVE WITH THE NUMBERS , NOT THE IDEA
Nothing too far arwy with the crown
I'm not too interested in "fixes" for this rifle, or claims of "my Tikka shoots x MOA groups all day", many/most Tikkas show quite acceptable accuracy, including this one but with a very limited range of projectiles. The purpose of this thread is to highlight that some Tikka's will/may have issues so don't doubt yourself or your shooting.
Many/most guys I see at the range are not interested in pissing about with multiple ammos, loads, fixes etc, they just want a rifle that works. I was assisting an experienced hunter and champion shotgun guy at the range yesterday, two Tikka's, one 6.5 CM and a 308. The 308 had a replacement scope on it, the latest Swaro, very nice too.
Anyhoo it was literally producing shotgun patterns, an irony not lost on the owner, it just wouldn't group. After checking lots of other stuff more than once I took a look at the suppressor and sure enough it looked like it had some strike. We replaced the supressor with one of mine, and he requested I try it first. Bingo - 3 shots into about 35 mm, followed by 3 from him into about the same and just like that he was sighted in (and away to buy a new suppressor haha).
Nothing to do with it being a Tikka, but symptomatic of issues people strike.
I dont really care, but I use the odd tikka occasionally and have shot dozens of 10rd groups with factory ammo from at least 5 different tikkas in .223 and .308 in the last couple of years and in my dataset the precision doesn't look too different to any other factory rifle, it's poor to average with most factory ammo and good with something the rifle "likes". Very very rarely "excellent".
I think the average group size across all the data i have is about 1.9MOA.
It's absolutely fine for hunting at conventional ranges on average, but it's silly to pretend that they're outstanding with every load.
Interesting attitude of wanting to shoot statistically relevant group sizes but not really being concerned about the rifle being mechanically sound before shooting said groups...
Im happy to use any brand of firearm as long as it functions properly, has the functional features i like and meets my precision requirements. I generally recommend Tikkas to people as they tend to have less inherent issues than other brands out of the box.
I haven't heard people saying Tikkas will shoot every load good.
My T3 today. Stiff L to R breeze. 20 shots. 1.5 moa. 80 grn Targex that it’s sighted in for. 2910 fps.
![]()
Restraint is the better part of dignity. Don't justify getting even. Do not do unto others as they do unto you if it will cause harm.
None of these tests are a very accurate representation of factory rifles using factory ammo. They should be done with new off the shelf rifles using the same scope and ammo batch number and same shooter.
It's pointless using a second hand rifle that who knows how it's been looked after and all these rifles are tested with different scope set ups, and every shooter has different skill levels.
Sent from my CPH2531 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks