Thread: Climate

Originally Posted by Moa Hunter

It is a shame that we can no longer engage lurch in debate, as such a situation will only re-enforce any feelings of being controlled and censored he has and is the polar opposite of what is needed - hearing the other person and being able to debate a counter position

the trouble is...in order to hear,you have to be willing to listen....as you said earlier,listening to other rabbits just makes you see hawks n foxes behind every cloud and tree....
sooner or later you have to be able to just let something go..... agree to disagree and move onwards.
when your mind is telling you there are bits of baby in your can of coca cola......its well past time to seek help

Originally Posted by Micky Duck

the trouble is...in order to hear,you have to be willing to listen....as you said earlier,listening to other rabbits just makes you see hawks n foxes behind every cloud and tree....
sooner or later you have to be able to just let something go..... agree to disagree and move onwards.
when your mind is telling you there are bits of baby in your can of coca cola......its well past time to seek help

I am willing to both hear and listen. I am not afraid that through someone espousing extreme ideas these ideas will infect my mind and I therefore need protecting

Originally Posted by Moa Hunter

I am willing to both hear and listen. I am not afraid that through someone espousing extreme ideas these ideas will infect my mind and I therefore need protecting

10000% correct.

The best cure for bad ideas is robust, open debate - not censorship.

Originally Posted by Ross Nolan

10000% correct.

The best cure for bad ideas is robust, open debate - not censorship.

Its a dilemma for Complaint Resolution people and Ombuds. If you block the frequent flyers/Querulant who obsessively feel wronged, on the day they are right and justified they might actually be denied justice.