For someone that's never shot over 400yds before,that dam good shooting.His set up must be good.
Printable View
For someone that's never shot over 400yds before,that dam good shooting.His set up must be good.
I guess you mean .5 MOAQuote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
Sent from my CPH2531 using Tapatalk
Which of these is the better load?Quote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
Attachment 286137
Attachment 286138
@Tentman I think, unfortunately, the thread title is a bit counterproductive, and everyone is just reading it and jumping in to respond with their thoughts to the title.
The nuanced significance of the unreliability of conclusions drawn from 3 shot groups can be found in post 19 here https://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co....cision-103608/
After reading this and related threads I'd never adjust my zero based on a 3 shot group. It would show whether I'm roughly within the known cone of fire for my rifle, or whether something had gone horribly wrong with my scope. That's all.
So not completely useless
There's a high probability that the top one would prove to be the better load.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimp
Same load same rifle. Need more data. Fire a 3 shot group with it and you could get either result. Not terribly informative.Quote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
Looks likely operator factors
Nope, just the variation you get in 3-rd groups. The operator can shoot consistent 10rd groups with a precise system, no issues thereQuote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
I happy to say I have never seen anything close to that with my shooting
Does your zero ever shift very far?Quote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
Used to wander a bit with wooden stock rifles. Now running synthetic tikkas and vx3s. No POI shift
Show us a few targets ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Longrun
I don't have any. They go in the bin when I leave the range
Two and half squares height difference....something else changed,range,position,wind,calmness,amount of sparrows farting next paddock over.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimp
