who made the barrel and or fitting work?
who made the barrel and or fitting work?
+1 There are plenty of questions that need to be asked. It is imo however, a good saftey plug for Blaser, in a way.
If a chamber can expand that much on a single firing, yet the primary locking of the action remains intact. Impressive.
I also think it is really poor form displayed by the owner of said barrel, to run somewhere else for answers before giving the fabricator of the barrel a chance to fault find and remedy. I would be highly pissed if I was the fabricator assuming he has not been given the chance.
Headspace is critical and has to be absolutely perfect for these actions to remain safe and function correctly. More so than a sloppy standard action
You will reach your max load well before you would in a standard camming action. So in order to have a functioning rifle you can never use overloaded ammo.
Primary extraction cannot be achieved unless it is well within safe limits. You normally have to increase barrel length if you chase the speed others get from the same cal in a standard action.
I would be putting the load used at the top of the fault list in this instance. If that is deemed to be safe......then look at the metals, tolerances and fabrication process.
Last edited by R93; 05-11-2013 at 09:49 PM.
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
End of the day, a wildcat load has no specs...
Metal, tolerance and fabrication process has no controls over either, and thus the issue we have in NZ with every backyarder thinking they are a gunsmith and no accountability and in most accounts no metallurgy experience and basic/limited machine skills and tools.
Primary extraction as a quote is understood by very few, and it seems that many also struggle with the basics of headspace
Who's barrel is it, who made the action and what's being done about it??
Bookmarks