Interesting the arguments about noise, pollution and other environmental impacts. It's not related at all to the "firearms safety" aspects of the discussion around arms legislation, reporting requirements and administration burden for clubs and ranges.
One wonders if the Phillipa Yasbeks of this world actually understand how the legislation works or if they are being intentionally murky to make firearms user groups appear worse than they actually are. Your average motorcross track would be worse for peak and average noise levels when compared to a range, would occupy a greater land footprint and see more pollution generated from fuel and oils burnt. Greater cost for injuries sustained too...
Bookmarks