I had thought too.
Printable View
I had thought too.
how about the judges that continue to let these useless pieces of shit back out to just carry on offending theres no actual deterrant
It's the law makers that need to change the terms if punishment. judges can only hand sentences acording to the law.
That's kinda true, the judges have a maximum to minimum penalty threshold to pick from to the offence committed. they also take into account other mitigating issues. i.e. 1st/2nd offence ,is justice best served with the offender incarcerated or paying a service to the community. The judge DOES has the last say on the penalty balanced to the crime, and yes the wet bus ticket does seem to be the preferred option
Interesting to see on Breakfast today they are no longer referring to it as a MSSA but a semi auto firearm.
They are let down by both the minimum and maximum sentences that they have to adhere too. I personally know 2 judges in this country who if they could would be dishing out far more severe sentences but they can not. The law does not allow them to.
I do
12 weeks Burnham or the other option? Burnham was the wet bus ticket
If I ad my way minimum would be increased 3x maximum 2x but then how do we pay for this? Tax increases that is how. What Govt in power is going to say on election year lets increase penalties but as a result there will be a tax increase? NONE that's how many. So judges sit there fiddling their fingers at sentences.
As New Zealand has seen many of our core services outsourced - both government and private sector, I suggest we outsource custodial sentences.....to China or Saudi Arabia.... we pay a "general living expense" for the criminal to be "looked after"....for life. The receiving country can then determine how the convict is treated :thumbsup: We could even send them first class....:thumbsup:
In a bag the problem is in nz we care more about the offender and couldn't give 2 fuks about the victims
@Jexla out of curiosity, are you actually the woman portrayed in your profile picture? Or is it a guide to make people have a different perception of you to make your comments and arguments easier in ways? In no way am I trying to offend you, but you certainly don't act like the girl portrayed would.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Stone
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Macca, I most certainly am a 6 foot 2 black guy in a yellow suit. Keep an eye out for me at the range, I had my tailor make me one for every day of the week, all different shades of yellow. That photo was taken on a Tuesday in case you were wondering ("woundering" for old mate Lee at DPS)
A Le Sape Congolese Dandy
https://youtu.be/W27PnUuXR_A
Time for confessions and coming clear about our avatars. Myself, I actually DO look like a look like a bundle of uncooked spaghetti in a metallic yellow sleeping bag. When I get turned on I like to bang big-time, and I don't fire blanks! But sometimes I'm slow to pick up on the cues or I don't get turned on at all - conditions known medically as hangfire and misfire respectively - and either will ruin a Sunday morning.
your not bitching or bitched about how hard it is to find a rental are you though @tiroatedson , and security for a-cat does not have to incur any damage done to a property, but once you get endorsements you need the right security which will lead to holes in walls and floors for securing safe.
@ROKTOY I have 4 daughters I am raising on my own I am 38 and in 12 years ill be mortgage free
I'm honestly pleased for you, I chose not to get a mortgage, I could have several times over.
But if I was to make comment of the fact that it was hard to find a place to rent and have firearms, which is most likely an honest fact in a lot of places. Does ta make me a c@t? I hope not, it is just me stating a fact.
And again, well done and I take my hat off to you for raising your kids singlehandedly, I know it won't have been easy.
It was obvious that the perp needed to be stopped by the fact that he had a personalised plate - a sure sign of a tosser in any language
Thank you 308 back on track
Ok, I've had a bit of a clean up, some peoples posts that are not offensive have been removed simply because they have a quote in them.
Stick to the topic or not I don't care but less of the personal attacks gentlemen.
Trying to see page 6 but this thread seems to be misbehaving.
Now I made a comment I can see it... Odd
Heard they caught this clown:thumbsup:
Also heard an interesting theory on the grouping.
It was from the police officer returning fire through his windshield.
Kind of makes sense as he would have needed to reach across to the get his gun out.
Hope his ears are ok:O_O:
You'd have to be joking? Surely no ones that dumb? But hey they're tried it before!!:D
I don't know but if I was in a that situation I'd shoot back anyway I could.
I looked at one of the first photos of that cop car. Looks to be around 17 holes in the passengers sides window. Glock takes a 17 round mag. Also there lights where shining down the road to where the perpetrators car was. Perp would not have known and would have gotten his head down was returning fire was coming his way. Would also explain the grouping.
Your only exposing your hand and the rest of your body is covered by the engine. If it got him to stop shooting and made him run away (which it looks highly likely) and give your body's time to also return fire then:thumbsup:
Attachment 74621
Also if you look at the bullet holes on the drivers side you can see the slight mark running up the window like a commit tail. That to me looks like the bullet skidded up the window. I'd say that was in coming fire. You won't get strike marks like that from inside the window angel is all wrong for that to happen.
Hope they give th perp a long stretch.
There's another photo on News Hub says "bullet holes in back window of car"
:wtfsmilie:
Ok so apart from that being wrong!
Would an SKS round (if that is what it was) go right through from front window and out the back?
Here the photo with article attached.
Police shootout in Morrinsville | Newshub
None of those shots were fired from inside the car, those guys guys wouldn't have anywhere near enough time to get a gun and they were likely jumping out already to run down the fleeing driver on foot, they were all incoming. Far too many holes for an SKS, looks like a mag dump, and yes the shots would go right through if the angles were right.
I don't know who gave you that theory, but it's not accurate.
Ok no worries. But have a look at that article @Savage1 no bullet holes out the back window.
Just a theory that made sense based on the photo evidence.
Shit 5 metres would be real scary!!whites of the eye stuff!!:O_O:
Bullets entering a windscreen tend to arc downwards, bullets leaving arc upwards for what its worth.
Five ten five hundred not nice. Yep white brown pants stuff alright.
Thanks for that @Beavis didn't know that.