Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 80
Like Tree81Likes

Thread: New week, new 'Ultra Vires' Police Action

  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Land of the Long White Cloud
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by 300CALMAN View Post
    So they are just going ahead and doing it law change or not.
    The law was changed about three or four years ago. I'm suprised it's taken them this long to start using it.

  2. #17
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,843
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    The law was changed about three or four years ago. I'm suprised it's taken them this long to start using it.
    They haven't used it though. No order in council has passed regarding this. They are just making it up themselves, business as usual.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Parahaki, Whangarei
    Posts
    1,274
    Went looking for definition of 'ultra vires', as I wasn't sure what koshogi and others meant.
    Found this link which would be helpful to others who are unsure of the term.

    http://www.open.edu/openlearn/societ...section-3.12.1

    I'd like to say that I'm no 'stupid', but 'less well informed' than I should be, regarding the Latin used by other posters.
    Found this link quite useful in understanding what ultra vires really means, and the outrageous statements and requirements being foisted on LAFAO's.
    Seems to me that the PNHQ are trying to get all firearms banned - by whatever means possible - so that their inefficiencies and shortcomings won't be exposed.
    gadgetman likes this.

  4. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Land of the Long White Cloud
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Beavis View Post
    They haven't used it though. No order in council has passed regarding this. They are just making it up themselves, business as usual.
    Apart from a Facebook post, what is to say they are doing it?

  5. #20
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,843
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    Apart from a Facebook post, what is to say they are doing it?
    Absolutely nothing - other than the word of the affected dealer. They tend to shy away from putting these policies in writing.

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    5,855
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    Source: https://www.facebook.com/firearmownersunitednz/

    Police are now reclassifying all imported AR15's as MSSA's.

    Police have once again overreached their authority. As of today, dealers now need to apply for an E cat import permit to bring in A Category AR15's. This effectively allows police to apply the special reason requirement to all AR imports. If police don't think you have a need for an A cat AR15 then they will decline your application.

    Police are attempting to declare guns which are not, by definition MSSA's, as MSSA's. We suspect this is a precursor to declaring all AR15's as MSSA's utilizing Polices power to create their own laws with an Order In Council. Paula Bennett once again the police are running amok under your watch, inventing law through groundless policy. We recently saw this with the Arms Code 2017. Now you are allowing police to redefine a type of gun.

    Stuart Nash MP you have talked to FOUNZ about removing police's ability to make law at will with an Order in Council. We suggest they may not be far off, again attempting to subvert the parliamentary law making process. It might be time for opposition parties to stand up to the police state we are descending into.

    Ron Mark - NZ First MP, Richard Prosser MP - New Zealand First List MP, as per your policy, we need to remove police from administering the Arms Act. They are incompetent. They are now a law unto themselves.
    Letter to the MPs

    Hello Paula Bennett

    Once again the police are running amok under your watch, inventing law through groundless policy. We recently saw this with the Arms Code 2017. Now you are allowing police to redefine a type of gun.

    I have been made aware of a policy change by the New Zealand Police Head Quarters (as detailed in the link below) defining ALL AR type rifles as E cat when importing. Even if they are Not MSSA (E cat) they are being defined as such. I cannot find anywhere in the arms act, any mention of Police being able to reclassify an A cat firearm as E cat when it does not have ANY E cat features. This means the Police are acting outside their mandate of upholding the law and are attempting to write it. (again!!!) They want the respect of the public yet time and time again, they step forward and march us towards a state where the Police write the law.

    https://m.facebook.com/firearmowners...id=18&__tn__=C

    Police are now reclassifying all imported AR15's as MSSA's
    Police have once again overreached their authority. As of today, dealers now need to apply for an E cat import permit to bring in A Category AR15's.
    This effectively allows police to apply the special reason requirement to all AR imports. If police don't think you have a need for an A cat AR15 then they will decline your application.
    Police are attempting to declare guns which are not, by definition MSSA's, as MSSA's.
    We suspect this is a precursor to declaring all AR15's as MSSA's utilizing Polices power to create their own laws with an Order In Council.

    With regards to this policy change I have a simple question:

    It appears that those in charge of initiating these policies have so little respect for the law they are charged to uphold, that they are prepared to write and enforce their own versions of the law beyond what is legally allowed. If they no longer have respect for the law, does this also mean they are no longer fit for the position they are employed in as they no longer law abiding people? If so I would ask that you seek their resignation if they continue to try enforce laws that have not been passed into legislation?

    With an election fast approaching, it seems the Police are doing everything they can to undermine our government.

    Thank you for your tim
    e
    Me (Name changed)
    P38, veitnamcam, gadgetman and 1 others like this.

  7. #22
    Gone................. mikee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Nelson, New Zealand
    Posts
    9,669
    Quote Originally Posted by hamsav View Post
    At what point do the police consider themselves not fit and proper people to handle fire arms.
    I think like the Defense force they are "specifically exempt" from the Arms act during the "course of their duties". I would have thought however in order the become a member of the police you would be held to a higher standard than us "commoners".

    I have lived in a Police State (Turkmenistan) in the 90's and we are fast heading in that direction I fear. People there were openly fearful of the criminals and the Police and the Secret Police..
    All those with dogs waiting no longer fear death. Those with many dogs waiting even welcome it in it's time.

  8. #23
    Member Jexla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    Apart from a Facebook post, what is to say they are doing it?
    I understand your skepticism, and I am often much the same when it comes to this sort of situation. You have no idea how much I've begged people to get this stuff in writing, but it's just not possible.

    The AO gets left to pass on the message to the applicants from PNHQ, thing is the AO knows they can't implicate themselves in writing to have PNHQ deny ever requesting it like they have now done in this case (much like the arms code scenario)

    It's a tricky situation for us, I can confirm we've had other dealers contact us with the exact same issue dating back to July. They however fear that coming out about the issue publicly will negatively affect their business because of how the police will treat them in the future, which is why they have contacted us and COLFO privately.

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Home - mainland nz, actual - Auckland
    Posts
    5,391
    @Jexla, when you say "us", who is that?
    Please excuse spelling, as finger speed is sometimes behind brain spped........ Or maybe the other wayy.....

  10. #25
    Member Jexla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Beaker View Post
    @Jexla, when you say "us", who is that?
    "us" in the first instance meant LAFAO.

    After that I am referring to FOUNZ.
    Beaker and Tommy like this.

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Home - mainland nz, actual - Auckland
    Posts
    5,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    FOUNZ
    Thanks for that.
    Please excuse spelling, as finger speed is sometimes behind brain spped........ Or maybe the other wayy.....

  12. #27
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    "us" in the first instance meant LAFAO.

    After that I am referring to FOUNZ.
    OK, what are they?

  13. #28
    Member Jexla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Wirehunt View Post
    OK, what are they?
    Law abiding firearm owners and FIREARM OWNERS UNITED NZ – Uniting Firearm Owners Of New Zealand / https://www.facebook.com/firearmownersunitednz
    Wirehunt, gadgetman and 223nut like this.

  14. #29
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,572
    Thanks.

  15. #30
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,572
    Needs an email follow thing. Some of us don't bookface.
    veitnamcam, mikee, Beaker and 1 others like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Court action against police
    By vbull in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-03-2017, 07:07 PM
  2. ASE ultra suppressors
    By camo wsm in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 15-08-2013, 01:12 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!