Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Delta Darkness


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By dannyb

Thread: Video of internal barrel temps for carbon vs steel barrel

  1. #1
    Caretaker stug's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rolleston, Canterbury
    Posts
    4,885

    Video of internal barrel temps for carbon vs steel barrel


  2. #2
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    8,590
    Very interesting
    #DANNYCENT

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Te Awamutu
    Posts
    856
    While he acknowledges the different ambient starting temperatures. He doesn't account for the difference in cooling rate when ambient is higher.
    This factor negates any of his direct comparisons between the barrels. Which is his only method of comparison.

  4. #4
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norf
    Posts
    5,469
    Confirms what you’d guess based on first principles. CF heats up more & stays hot longer

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    6
    Ummmm....interesting artical

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,969
    Surprises me not, it does.

    The heavier all steel barrel and chamber would have had more thermal inertia (heat capacity) and so the increase in temperature was less at 2 minutes, when the probe had stabilised. It's like recoil - a heavier rifle has more inertia and acquires less recoil velocity from firing the same cartridge and bullet.

    The very slightly slower cooling in the carbon wrapped barrel is what you's expect too, unless you believe that the fibre conducts heat faster in one direction than others and that it would be outwards (proposed by some CF barrel makers).

    What did surprise me was how little the barrel (throat and chamber) was warmed up. 34 degrees Farenheit above ambient must have very little effect in damaging a throat. More like 1000 degrees (C or F) for 1/1000 sec is what I think could melt or oxidise steel. A measurement say 10 seconds after firing a shot would more accurately reflect actual throat conditions in real rapid fire. Hatcher, in his Notebook, described shooting 3006 machine guns till the barrel glowed cherry red - that's what people are taking about when they say "fast strings". I once did a jungle lane shoot where I fired 30 shots with the 303 over about 10 minutes and the barrel was so hot it burnt my back when I slung it over my shoulder and it left a scar (but it wasn't glowing red). However, this U tube experiment did show that 1 or 2 minutes between Creedmore shots allows the barrel to return to a barely warm to touch temperature and would be unlikely to cause any damage. It would be interesting to repeat the experiment with a 26 Nosler and a 6.5 Grendel.

  7. #7
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    8,590
    Be interesting to see the same test with fluted vs non fluted (same profile)
    57jl likes this.
    #DANNYCENT

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for Carbon Barrel Experience
    By Cooper in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 16-09-2019, 08:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!