Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 427
Like Tree669Likes

Thread: .243 load development part deux

Threaded View

  1. #11
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    10,891
    Note on language -

    You can't tighten a group. It has already been shot, it isn't getting any tighter than it is. You could put a patch over one of the holes I suppose.


    When you make changes in your load specifications, what you hope to do is improve the precision of the system. You hope that you'll shoot smaller groups in future as a proxy for measuring the precision of the system. However with 5-shot samples we actually have basically no idea what the precision of this system is at the moment, and it is impossible to measure any improvement or attribute it to any changes with any evidential basis.



    Have a flip through this thread - I spent 15 years following the same handloading approaches and achieved some good results over the years in spite of the process rather than because of it; and with a lot of uncertainty and wasted time/components/effort. Essentially I realised I end up with the same result no matter what I did, the process was actually pointless, just fooling myself fiddling with characteristics that didn't actually change anything.

    There is a simpler way - follow the simple process and you'd be in a position now of knowing much more, with less components used. I would prefer if others didn't have to waste their time and components either.


    https://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co....opment-106057/



    If you're seating the bullets anywhere in the functional window you should be (0.030-0.100 off the lands, or mag length - whichever is shorter) I have yet to see any convincing evidence that tweaking the seating depth makes any difference to precision. I have tested it with a few bullets and I cannot find a difference with valid measurements. Likewise powder charge. But, maybe this is the situation where that doesn't hold true.


    However, given the initial results with those massive groups - first step for me now would be immediately dropping the bullet and trying another, or looking at is there something wrong with the rifle/scope mounts. Do you have a bank of previous data from the factory ammo with this bullet?

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Just the tip......7 rem mag A-Tip load development
    By dannyb in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 13-05-2024, 04:51 PM
  2. 300 WM load development
    By alphaDelta in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-09-2023, 10:07 PM
  3. 168 TMK in 308 load development
    By Backsteaks in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 26-08-2021, 09:08 PM
  4. My first load development
    By Remmodel7 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-06-2021, 02:55 PM
  5. 300 Wsm Load development
    By mcche171 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-05-2019, 03:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!