Thread: 300 Rum Brass Cases

Originally Posted by L.R

Then why is there a reference to 300 blaser mag? A Caliber that no one has had fuck all to do with. Seems like a obvious dig to me.
I'm sure Abe can stand up for himself, only problem is every time he does he gets the DELETE threats too.

+1
It's about 300 rum brass why even talk about blaser brass?

It would be like me going wank wank 284 lapua brass and Winchester but oh don't forget 17hmr brass. . . . . . .

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by tui_man2

+1
It's about 300 rum brass why even talk about blaser brass?

It would be like me going wank wank 284 lapua brass and Winchester but oh don't forget 17hmr brass. . . . . . .

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

No it wouldn't you would need totally different tooling, you should know that.

Originally Posted by Wildman

No it wouldn't you would need totally different tooling, you should know that.

I know this but if he had seen a blaser case it is different enough not to be able to use the same tooling anyway

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by tui_man2

I know this but if he had seen a blaser case it is different enough not to be able to use the same tooling anyway

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

Well that might be a good point to contribute to the conversation, no?

Originally Posted by Wildman

Well that might be a good point to contribute to the conversation, no?

It would, but it's also funny letting people go on like they know an can compare it to something when it's quite different :rolleyes:. So it is like comparing what I said . . . . . So as Luke said it's a wined an has not point been there what so ever

Even more so when 300 rum brass was in the said test.. . . . . . , . .

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2