Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 43 of 43
Like Tree38Likes

Thread: 7saum same load different speeds

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwijames View Post
    Seating depth may be a factor to consider.
    That’s a good point when I started using rl26 in my Saum seating depth made a quite a difference.

  2. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    802
    Ive been following this with interest as we have been loading the rounds for JMJWs rifle using my press, dies and chronograph.

    Powder batch variation: We tested this by loading up some rounds using a batch of reloader 26 that I had been using in my 21 inch SAUM at 2940fps. This powder achieved a similar speed as the original batch in JMJWs rifle both roughly 2810fps so doesn't seem to be the powder.

    Chronograph: This has been reliable for me in the past, last used in March. I was given a load for my own personal SAUM with the rifle and I chronied it to within 5fps of the old owner so I don't think the chrony is out. (Will double check on my rifle though)

    Neck Tension: I did wonder if neck tension could vary based on dies? It would be interesting to load some using a differnt set of dies.

    Seating depth: How much tolerance do others accept when seating projectiles? If aiming for 2.240 base to ogive would you accept cases that end up 2.238 and 2.242? This seems to be about the variance I get with my seating die and assumed this was due to variation between projectiles?

    Cheers
    Last edited by Nick.m; Yesterday at 10:30 PM.
    chainsaw and JMJW like this.

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    1,768
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick.m View Post
    Ive been following this with interest as we have been loading the rounds for JMJWs rifle using my press, dies and chronograph.

    Powder batch variation: We tested this by loading up some rounds using a batch of reloader 26 that I had been using in my 21 inch SAUM at 2940fps. This powder achieved a similar speed as the original batch in JMJWs rifle both roughly 2810fps so doesn't seem to be the powder.

    Chronograph: This has been reliable for me in the past, last used in March. I was given a load for my own personal SAUM with the rifle and I chronied it to within 5fps of the old owner so I don't think the chrony is out. (Will double check on my rifle though)

    Neck Tension: I did wonder if neck tension could vary based on dies? It would be interesting to load some using a differnt set of dies.

    Seating depth: How much tolerance do others accept when seating projectiles? If aiming for 2.940 base to ogive would you accept cases that end up 2.938 and 2.942? This seems to be about the variance I get with my seating die and assumed this was due to variation between projectiles?

    Cheers
    You’ll easily see that variation most of the time due to brass/bullet discrepancies and also even just putting a little extra pressure on press handle at bottom of stroke will give you more depth vs just gently touching at bottom of stroke.

    Minor seating depth changes don’t do jack shit.

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,547
    Have you got virgin brass to try? Theirs no gst added to the speed of that load for a sale I shot the same load in my rifle and 1 other all between 2880-2920 rifle depended checking scales would be a good one my digital run .5 grain difference to my beams

  5. #35
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,631
    Before you do anything check ACTUAL drop at distance to determine ACTUAL velocity.

    Likely you will only need to adjust drop chart, or not.

    You will have to do this before you shoot animals anyway, the sooner you do it the better
    BRADS likes this.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by 7mmsaum View Post
    Before you do anything check ACTUAL drop at distance to determine ACTUAL velocity.

    Likely you will only need to adjust drop chart, or not.

    You will have to do this before you shoot animals anyway, the sooner you do it the better
    Yep that’s the plan hopefully this weekend. The load going 2810fps seems to shoot very well so will just stick with that for now and can always try some different loads later on.
    7mmsaum likes this.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelton View Post
    Have you got virgin brass to try? Theirs no gst added to the speed of that load for a sale I shot the same load in my rifle and 1 other all between 2880-2920 rifle depended checking scales would be a good one my digital run .5 grain difference to my beams
    All the rounds fired so far has been new brass

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by McNotty View Post
    You’ll easily see that variation most of the time due to brass/bullet discrepancies and also even just putting a little extra pressure on press handle at bottom of stroke will give you more depth vs just gently touching at bottom of stroke.

    Minor seating depth changes don’t do jack shit.
    Agree

    I found seating out further by 0.130” made a significant difference in velocity in my rifle.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    579
    It'll be slower because of throat wear, virgin brass (usually 10-30fps slower than 1x fired), I'm guessing you gave it a solid clean when you got it + barrel wear equals reduced velocities, powder lot variation, projectile lot variation, primer lot variation, possibly scale measurement variation, brass lot internal water capacity variation. So easy to see why you have reduced velocity vs original load.
    All barrels slow down with use. Just ask any target shooter than wears out barrels. Usually it wont drop velocity until you give it a really good clean and then it wont get it's velocity back until you add more powder.
    My 6.5prc has 1000 rounds down the tube now and has slowed down after each serious clean, which required increases in powder charge to mostly regain. It requires more powder in a now slightly looser tolerance barrel to reach the same pressure to get the same velocity again.
    Also do load development with fired brass to find max load and velocities as virgin brass is softer and loses energy to expand into the chamber for the first firing.

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by McNotty View Post
    You’ll easily see that variation most of the time due to brass/bullet discrepancies and also even just putting a little extra pressure on press handle at bottom of stroke will give you more depth vs just gently touching at bottom of stroke.

    Minor seating depth changes don’t do jack shit.
    Agree

    I found seating out further by 0.130” made a significant difference in velocity in my rifle.

  11. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    1,887
    I seat mine in mm... so if 59.06mm, il seat to 59.05 or 59.07 prob way overkill, but i do it that way. also neck tension would make a difference, especially between dies, neck bushing die ? what are the 2x dies and are both sets used in his rifle and ours the same brass ?

  12. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    1,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Roarless20 View Post
    It'll be slower because of throat wear, virgin brass (usually 10-30fps slower than 1x fired), I'm guessing you gave it a solid clean when you got it + barrel wear equals reduced velocities, powder lot variation, projectile lot variation, primer lot variation, possibly scale measurement variation, brass lot internal water capacity variation. So easy to see why you have reduced velocity vs original load.
    All barrels slow down with use. Just ask any target shooter than wears out barrels. Usually it wont drop velocity until you give it a really good clean and then it wont get it's velocity back until you add more powder.
    My 6.5prc has 1000 rounds down the tube now and has slowed down after each serious clean, which required increases in powder charge to mostly regain. It requires more powder in a now slightly looser tolerance barrel to reach the same pressure to get the same velocity again.
    Also do load development with fired brass to find max load and velocities as virgin brass is softer and loses energy to expand into the chamber for the first firing.
    I alsways gatheres as when you give it a really good clean and remove copper etc. it slows down as its "lubrication" eg. the copper coating has gone and needs to reform again ?

  13. #43
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    10,035
    My records indicate that between 0.010" jump and 0.130" jump in my 6mmGT there is only 14fps difference in mean velocity (10rd samples at each). I doubt that a small discrepancy in seating depth is causing the difference in velocity.


    If you have obtained the velocity by measuring with a Garmin chrono, you've done the best you can to obtain an accurate measurement. It is correct. Obtaining velocities by shooting for drops is fraught, the system has so many other potential error sources. Chronos just work these days.


    Cleaning back a barrel that has been through the initial speedup will cause a drop in velocity that will never come back without increasing powder charge. This may be the primary cause, along with some stacking tolerances of other minor differences. 90 fps is a large drop though.


    I have recorded 100+ fps velocity difference with old or humid powder cf new powder of the same type.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load for 7saum 162eldm rl26
    By Gkp in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 27-06-2024, 05:19 PM
  2. 140 SGK @ 7 RM speeds?
    By muka88 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-05-2020, 08:25 PM
  3. Help with speeds!
    By superdiver in forum Shooting
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-04-2019, 01:40 PM
  4. 284 load speeds
    By tomo in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-08-2017, 08:51 PM
  5. 223 speeds
    By 6mm ackley in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14-02-2016, 02:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!