Thread: Subsonic 308

Years ago i shot a red in the shoulder with military fmj that i hadn't cut enough off the tip out of my old 303 with almost no rifleing left and it ended up in the hind quarter, basicly turned 90 degrees to flight path inside the animal!

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

If you can't get expansion and or fragmentation then that would be the next best thing.
How do you guarantee it tumbling tho and not just upsetting a bit and pissing off in a different direction in the animal.

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Don't you just use the minimum about of powder to get the projectile out of the barrel and let the wind tumble it

On a serious note Cam, what would a projectile suited for the 30-30 go like as a sub? Maybe even Hornadys 'FPX' projectile.

AHH scratch that last comment, just re-read the first post "Pistol" projectile. You are a bit more advanced than my thinking, with projectiles suited to sub sonic speed.

Looks like they were effective anyway, I wonder how far away they would be effective to.

Thats what i got from a greg duley arcitle on the subject. Also not long ago there was a write up called 338 ninja and he had special subsonic projectiles that were designed to fragment at low velocity and had like a 20 grain .17 sabot in the middle of it that went straight through

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

So any good recipes for subsonic loads for deer in 308? Cheers

Can't say I have tried any others.
Still waiting on spanners :rolleyes:

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Send me your ph number Cam and we'll sort final billet size.
Maybe then I can send you some to test

Sent

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

If you can't get expansion and or fragmentation then that would be the next best thing.
How do you guarantee it tumbling tho and not just upsetting a bit and pissing off in a different direction in the animal.

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Wee bit out of my league here but, when the 5.56x45 was designed and tested before the "Nam" they were relying on the tumbling effect to cause massive wounding, now im pretty certain that the projectile was a 55gr pill called M193, Changed when the 556x45 became a Nato round in 77 because It was apparently inhumane due to the massive wounds it caused in comparasion to its small size. It tumbled and yawed I believe because of its centre of gravity was close to the base of the pill. Its tendancy to yaw and tumble "could" well be recreated by using a 7.62 pill with a similar profile/scale to the M193. Unsure what the lower velocity will do but a naturally unstable projectile is just that so maybe worth a go. 110gr barnes hehehe

Light weight 30cal pills are pretty much as long as they are round so even if it tumbles you might as well be shooting a round ball .

I can see the logic in tumbling but its to random and impact velocity is to low to produce significant wounding in a subsonic round.
You need a fragile copper jacket around a soft lead core that will expand and fragment with sharp copper edges in heaviest weight you can stabilize .
Imho.

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

You need a fragile copper jacket around a soft lead core that will expand and fragment with sharp copper edges in heaviest weight you can stabilize .
Imho.

You're onto it
Want bonding?, hollow point?, plastic tip, lead tip, steel tip?

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

Light weight 30cal pills are pretty much as long as they are round so even if it tumbles you might as well be shooting a round ball .

I can see the logic in tumbling but its to random and impact velocity is to low to produce significant wounding in a subsonic round.
You need a fragile copper jacket around a soft lead core that will expand and fragment with sharp copper edges in heaviest weight you can stabilize .
Imho.

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Sorry I think you misunderstood, I didn't mean use light pills, quite the opposite, the M193 was long so a 7.62 with a similar profile would probably be reasonably heavy. What I meant was that if the centre of gravity is towards the base, they are more likely to tumble.
Heavy, long, frangible tumblers then are sure to be a winner!!
The ones you are using sure dealt to little piggy anyhow, so keep up the good work!

Originally Posted by Spanners

You're onto it
Want bonding?, hollow point?, plastic tip, lead tip, steel tip?

All irrelevant if it will expand violently fragment and retain around half its weight.

Whatever tip it needs to do that?

Bc is irrelevant also out to 80y

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

All irrelevant if it will expand violently fragment and retain around half its weight.

Whatever tip it needs to do that?

Bc is irrelevant also out to 80y

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Tip is more to initiate expansion
Something hard or non compressible will move something softer around it
Testing time soon

Originally Posted by Spanners

Tip is more to initiate expansion
Something hard or non compressible will move something softer around it
Testing time soon

Something hard but with very low density will have no momentum and stop suddenly while the projectile expands around it.
But if soft enough should not need anything ?

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2