Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 117
Like Tree175Likes

Thread: Decades of 1080….before and after

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    6,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Moutere View Post
    Exactly. Money talks.
    The deers wars came and went. Now deer numbers steadily increase without the same magnitude of pressure from private enterprise as cost, compliance and complexity increase and markets change with the passage of time.
    The markets for venison still exist for one example - however they have been severely constrained due to large areas where animals cannot be taken for consumption due to the risk of residual levels of poison detecable in the animal products. Any shipment heading overseas needs to be at zero detectable, or the entire shipment is canned which couold run many tens of containers. Financial suicide to risk it... I know of a few outfits that could start up export tomorrow if not for the risk - this is the same as recently found with 1080 detectable residues in certain honey products.

    Poisoning is a solution, that is true but the answer I don't think is solely poisoning and solely 'uncontrolled' air dropping as the broadcast method. Applying the bait by station, logging/documenting and either disposing or recovering of carcasses, and recovery of unused baits as well as funding a research regime for testing and establishing levels of residual poisons across the feral populations would go a long way towards allowing a commercial control mechanism to restart. Against that - you have a lot of potential for spatial conflict on increasing numbers of people wanting to utilise a shrinking allocation for resource (this is the same problem with commercial/recreational fisheries in a nutshell).
    Moa Hunter likes this.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    1,893
    Quote Originally Posted by No.3 View Post
    The markets for venison still exist for one example - however they have been severely constrained due to large areas where animals cannot be taken for consumption due to the risk of residual levels of poison detecable in the animal products. Any shipment heading overseas needs to be at zero detectable, or the entire shipment is canned which couold run many tens of containers. Financial suicide to risk it... I know of a few outfits that could start up export tomorrow if not for the risk - this is the same as recently found with 1080 detectable residues in certain honey products.

    Poisoning is a solution, that is true but the answer I don't think is solely poisoning and solely 'uncontrolled' air dropping as the broadcast method. Applying the bait by station, logging/documenting and either disposing or recovering of carcasses, and recovery of unused baits as well as funding a research regime for testing and establishing levels of residual poisons across the feral populations would go a long way towards allowing a commercial control mechanism to restart. Against that - you have a lot of potential for spatial conflict on increasing numbers of people wanting to utilise a shrinking allocation for resource (this is the same problem with commercial/recreational fisheries in a nutshell).
    My comparison to the wild venison market was that even with big pressure and big private enterprise the deer endured.
    Possums and rats are no different and I would also challenge anecdotal evidence that possums ever declined significantly due to the fur market.

    I do however agree that aerial poison is only a tool that one day needs to give way to other maintained control methods. I am genuinely heartened be the inroads being made in the Perth Valley for example.
    I am not pro, nor against. Maybe indifferent to a necessary tool.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Moutere View Post
    My comparison to the wild venison market was that even with big pressure and big private enterprise the deer endured.
    Possums and rats are no different and I would also challenge anecdotal evidence that possums ever declined significantly due to the fur market.

    I do however agree that aerial poison is only a tool that one day needs to give way to other maintained control methods. I am genuinely heartened be the inroads being made in the Perth Valley for example.
    I am not pro, nor against. Maybe indifferent to a necessary tool.
    What do you believe was the maximum possum population total in NZ ?

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    1,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post
    What do you believe was the maximum possum population total in NZ ?
    Anecdotally?

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Moutere View Post
    Anecdotally?
    From your previous :'Possums and rats are no different and I would also challenge anecdotal evidence that possums ever declined significantly due to the fur market'.

    We need a base number to work from

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    1,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post
    From your previous :'Possums and rats are no different and I would also challenge anecdotal evidence that possums ever declined significantly due to the fur market'.

    We need a base number to work from
    No, you need a number it seems.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Moutere View Post
    No, you need a number it seems.
    I wish to consider your previously stated challenge, on what numbers ( evidence ) is it based ?

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Back to hunting after a few years(decades) off
    By Butch73 in forum Introductions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-01-2021, 08:04 AM
  2. More of this and less 1080!
    By Jacobite in forum Other outdoors, sports, huts and tracks
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 26-09-2016, 07:06 PM
  3. 1080
    By Rock river arms hunter in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-09-2016, 08:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!