Thread: 1000m rifle.... What?

6.5x55 adopted in Norway 1894

30-06 designed in USA in 1906

308 designed in USA in 1952

They appear to be calibres not actions .

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

They appear to be calibres not actions .

Chamberings if you're getting technical

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

They appear to be calibres not actions .

Indeed they are, maybe he meant a T3 I.e. ancient caliber in modern action ?

Try this as an example
Vihtavuori have there usual loading data for 6.5x55 in the main section , then they have this
Products - Lapua

Please heed the warnings.

22lr and a 200 moa rail

Originally Posted by ARdave

22lr and a 200 moa rail

That rail wouldn't be cheap . Idd put a 200 moa bend upwards in the end of the barrel .Yup !

Was this the CheyTac you were meaning?

Has anyone mentioned 300Win Mag?

First the minimum body taper. Less taper= less case stretch. Also a better gas seal and it grips the chamber walls tighter which meant less thrust transmitted on the locking mechanism. Also a straight walled case ejects easier than a tapered case

The steep shoulder slows down brass flow so that= longer brass life. Also confined burning gasses in the case longer and that helped powder consumption

Longer necks, projectile doesn't take up powder space, also doesn't look like hell

That's pretty much how I read it, I would copy and paste it but I can't. I can screen shot it though if you want or send you the pdf file @Gibo

I found the tapered case bit interesting, I would have thought the tapered case would extract easier

Originally Posted by Toby

First the minimum body taper. Less taper= less case stretch. Also a better gas seal and it grips the chamber walls tighter which meant less thrust transmitted on the locking mechanism. Also a straight walled case ejects easier than a tapered case

The steep shoulder slows down brass flow so that= longer brass life. Also confined burning gasses in the case longer and that helped powder consumption

Longer necks, projectile doesn't take up powder space, also doesn't look like hell

That's pretty much how I read it, I would copy and paste it but I can't. I can screen shot it though if you want or send you the pdf file @Gibo

I found the tapered case bit interesting, I would have thought the tapered case would extract easier

So longer brass life and easier extraction......must be more to it?

Originally Posted by Gibo

So longer brass life and easier extraction......must be more to it?

More speed for same pressure.

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by Gibo

So longer brass life and easier extraction......must be more to it?

Fire forming brass has been the only reason I haven't bothered having a crack at one over the years.

Originally Posted by jakewire

Fire forming brass has been the only reason I haven't bothered having a crack at one over the years.

that's its only downfall.It cant be to long before you can buy 260AI cases if you can already get 280Ai.

Originally Posted by Toby

First the minimum body taper. Less taper= less case stretch. Also a better gas seal and it grips the chamber walls tighter which meant less thrust transmitted on the locking mechanism. Also a straight walled case ejects easier than a tapered case

The steep shoulder slows down brass flow so that= longer brass life. Also confined burning gasses in the case longer and that helped powder consumption

Longer necks, projectile doesn't take up powder space, also doesn't look like hell

That's pretty much how I read it, I would copy and paste it but I can't. I can screen shot it though if you want or send you the pdf file @Gibo

I found the tapered case bit interesting, I would have thought the tapered case would extract easier

The tapered case part makes no sense....