Thread: Anyone else disappointed with M4s?

Yeh me too. I'm really bummed out that military approved rifles aren't as good as ones I modify at home. Them SAS dudes could learn a thing or two from me - I've shot a goat at 440yds with a 6.78485`356 X 71856-`976 on a rest with no one shooting back at me with grenade launchers and AK 47's.

To be honest you lot ridiculing Military weapons Is beyond funny. THEY ARE MILITARY WEAPONS I'm sure they would laugh their heads off at your attempts more or less. We hunt deer NOT people. Next time anyone of you have to target and shoot a person or they will shoot you back - then you can comment on military arms. Otherwise pull yer fucking heads in. You really think you'd be interested in shooting a little group of 5 shots one foot to the left of the cunt with a turban firing full auto AK at you? All you want in that scenario is more firepower jam free. You may think firefights are you stickining yer head up with yer gun and firing back but they ain't. You F-ing well keep your body behind a solid object and one person sticks the gun up, points it behind them and empties a mag, drops the fucking mag, feeds anopther one in and keeps firing till another gun can join in. An accurate rifle means fucking diddly squat. A rifle that won't jam and throws lead down field with little recoil - give us that every day. After that some accuracy is needed but you worry about that once you've confirmed your not riddled and still have radio.

Hardly the same as a comfy day at the Range. Have any of you actually been fired upon whilst in charge of your firearm? If not how are you giving any sort of appraisal on a military firearm? I'm fairly bloody sure the M4 wasn't meant for a bunch of 'enthusiasts' to try target shooting with it.