Thread: Harris vs Atlas Bipod

Originally Posted by R93

To be fair, I was convinced by the video. The way it fits to the stock is the only annoying bit for me. I will see what KG reckons and maybe I will get in line for a play. It is claimed I can wreck an Anvil. It should be fun.

The rail attachment put me off for ages too. Once you have one you realise it's not in the way or a problem in the slightest, and QD is super handy. I prefer to carry the rifle with bipod detached and in pack, and attach it as needed for balance/handling reasons.

See for work rifles I don't shag around like that. In fact it would be a real pain to do it.

Originally Posted by gimp

The rail attachment put me off for ages too. Once you have one you realise it's not in the way or a problem in the slightest, and QD is super handy. I prefer to carry the rifle with bipod detached and in pack, and attach it as needed for balance/handling reasons.

Getting there. I will need to see one in person.

Originally Posted by Wirehunt

See for work rifles I don't shag around like that. In fact it would be a real pain to do it.

You don't actually have to remove it all the time just because it's QD.

About the only thing I can think of that would improve the Atlas is if they came up with a QD option that could be used with an Anshultz rail instead of the picatinny.

Tisk Tussock, what you're moaning about I call advantages

That other one doesn't have auto closing like the Harris does....