Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Delta


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 50
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: how much to convert a rem700 243 to 7mm08

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,688
    Quote Originally Posted by scottrods View Post
    keeping the 243.

    bought a 270 as well
    I think my 243 with 20inch barrel and suppressor is undergunned for a big canty red in the 300m range. Some keyboard jockey on here told me that I needed a 7mm08 instead of a 270. But a SPSS 700 fell in my lap for less than $900 and my other 2 hunting buddies use 270.
    I'm keeping the 243 for everything below big red, and the 270 for larger or longer requirements on big animals.
    falconhell likes this.

  2. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,688
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post
    I bet in the future, when you reach into the cupboard, you grab the .243 more often
    That won't be hard because most of my shooting is for roos or goats. But there is the annual trip or two that may required a bigger bang.

  3. #33
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,122
    Quote Originally Posted by scottrods View Post
    I think my 243 with 20inch barrel and suppressor is undergunned for a big canty red in the 300m range. Some keyboard jockey on here told me that I needed a 7mm08 instead of a 270. But a SPSS 700 fell in my lap for less than $900 and my other 2 hunting buddies use 270.
    I'm keeping the 243 for everything below big red, and the 270 for larger or longer requirements on big animals.
    I have a unreasonable dislike for the 270 but I can't fault that logic.
    veitnamcam likes this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  4. #34
    Member kimjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,635
    Hunter and outdoor writer Chuck Hawks notes: "When using the .243 to hunt medium-size big game animals, bullet selection is paramount. Rapid (but controlled) expansion is very important, as the small diameter 6mm bullet has little shocking power if it does not expand and expend its energy inside of the animal.

    That kind of sums it up for me. Most americans consider it to be a varmint rifle and the factory ammo reflects this use. With the right ammo its a good calibre, just like the .223 and .222 are.

    Kj

  5. #35
    Member 6MMBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gibson,Western Australia
    Posts
    301
    Haha love it kimjon, I use a 223 for deer 90% of the time,
    And cullers used the 222 a bit.
    Good thing they didn't know who chuck hawks was.
    Dose that men the 223 is better then 243 now.

    Tussock it was done on an iPad, I don't have a keyboard.
    Sorry

  6. #36
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    8,931
    Thats the truth right there Tussock.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  7. #37
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,122
    Quote Originally Posted by 6MMBR View Post
    Haha love it kimjon, I use a 223 for deer 90% of the time,
    And cullers used the 222 a bit.
    Good thing they didn't know who chuck hawks was.
    Dose that men the 223 is better then 243 now.

    Tussock it was done on an iPad, I don't have a keyboard.
    Sorry
    Cullers only went to the 222 because they could put more 222 ammo in a bag.

  8. #38
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwijames View Post
    Cullers only went to the 222 because they could put more 222 ammo in a bag.
    My old boss was a culler and too date probably has been responsible for the demise for over 100,000 deer.
    When culling he used a .270 among others. Still does.
    I hate the friggin things along with
    poo 4 3's. But ya can't argue with results.
    It's all personal preference.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. So please forgive my sausage fingers!!!
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Galatea
    Posts
    1,099
    Theres something to be said about the experience gained when your shooting big numbers of animals.

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

  10. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    Hummmmmmm scottrods has probably already converted his rifle now and is out on a hill somewere lining a deer up, meanwhile......................................... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................................................... .................................................. .................................................. ................................................

  11. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,688
    nope. Keeping the 243 as is, and 270 for bigger stuff.

  12. #42
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post

    It's a long haul into the hills, gas is not cheap etc etc. It makes sense to try and carry something that optimizes your chances.

    Very well put Tussock

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Set trigger for rem700
    By Smiddy in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-03-2012, 06:58 PM
  2. Rem700 replacement stock
    By kiwijames in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-03-2012, 08:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!