Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member sneeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    nelson/marlborough
    Posts
    3,366
    Have you narrowed it down to those 2 scopes or your not aware of other options? How and on what are you going to use it?

  2. #2
    MEB
    MEB is offline
    probably drunk MEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    147
    cowboy has a sightron. Said the same as everyone else when he first got it. But after a year of heavy use the coating on the glass has gone weird and you can no longer see through it very well.

  3. #3
    The Original Striker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    714
    Ive sorta narrowed it down to these two. If I could get a NF HS turret(no ZS) for a decent price here in nz that would sway my decsion some what, Its going to be used on a 7mm rem mag. Id really like a March or S&B but at the end of the day my eyes cant disearn the differance between a March and NF. Prefer not to go to the vortex.
    What model was cowboys scope MEB?

  4. #4
    MEB
    MEB is offline
    probably drunk MEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northland
    Posts
    147
    It wouldn't have been anything flash. I'll find out.

  5. #5
    Cutting Edge Bullets Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    325
    The only trouble with the NF is they are a big heavy scope for a 7mm mag the March is alot lighter and smaller in size. Personally I think the March has better glass than than NF but the NF will be better in low light.
    1000yds is fun, 1500yds is getting interesting, 2000yds is exciting, 2500yds will blow your mind

  6. #6
    Member sneeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    nelson/marlborough
    Posts
    3,366
    Striker If its a dedcated LR rifle then Night Force, if its a carry rifle then I personally prefer something lighter than the 30+ oz a night force weighs.The sightron will be lighter and a lot cheaper.If you cant tell the difference between a NF and a March then it could be well worth a real look at the vortex HS or PST range along with plenty of others.




    Quote Originally Posted by Terminator View Post
    The only trouble with the NF is they are a big heavy scope for a 7mm mag the March is alot lighter and smaller in size. Personally I think the March has better glass than than NF but the NF will be better in low light.
    Which NF will be better than which march in low light? they both make a range of scopes with diferent sized objectives, from what Iv seen given equall exit pupil then the march is better.

  7. #7
    Cutting Edge Bullets Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by sneeze View Post
    Striker If its a dedcated LR rifle then Night Force, if its a carry rifle then I personally prefer something lighter than the 30+ oz a night force weighs.The sightron will be lighter and a lot cheaper.If you cant tell the difference between a NF and a March then it could be well worth a real look at the vortex HS or PST range along with plenty of others.





    Which NF will be better than which march in low light? they both make a range of scopes with diferent sized objectives, from what Iv seen given equall exit pupil then the march is better.

    I was talking about the 2.5x25x42 March
    1000yds is fun, 1500yds is getting interesting, 2000yds is exciting, 2500yds will blow your mind

  8. #8
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,566
    The March I looked through had much better glass than my NF, but I didn't like the thick cross hairs.

    A MK4 would be hard to beat for weigh etc, except for a VX3 LR, both had better glass than the NF I tested.

  9. #9
    Not just an internet expert... The Claw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gore
    Posts
    2,053
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg View Post
    The March I looked through had much better glass than my NF, but I didn't like the thick cross hairs.

    A MK4 would be hard to beat for weigh etc, except for a VX3 LR, both had better glass than the NF I tested.
    Premier Light Tactical...

    Better than a mk4/vx3... but then I'm biased... Better than any NF I have owned (optics wise). Glass as good as my Swarovski Z6. Simple turret design, 2 turn, zero stop with indicator for 1st/2nd turn and L or R windage. illuminated reticle. Feels the same weight as my mk4 with alumina covers.

    Actually, I'm wrong, the mk 4 is awesome... Want to buy mine?:grin::grin:
    http://www.eurooptic.com/premier-ret...in-dt-ccw.aspx

    Also in milrad if that is your flavour



    If it's not a first round hit you need to practice more

  10. #10
    Member sneeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    nelson/marlborough
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg View Post
    The March I looked through had much better glass than my NF, but I didn't like the thick cross hairs.

    A MK4 would be hard to beat for weigh etc, except for a VX3 LR, both had better glass than the NF I tested.
    If that was mine Greg it was the DE Plex in hunting scope,plenty of finer choices that are more target focused. Have at times wished the posts where a little heavier but I find the cross hairs bloody good for a non iluminated reticel .This was about 600 yds on 18x IIRC.
    Name:  PB300147.jpg
Views: 4646
Size:  75.2 KB

    That Premier looks very nice Sam, how are you finding it and the FFP?
    Last edited by sneeze; 06-12-2011 at 10:34 PM.

  11. #11
    DAF
    DAF is offline
    Administrator DAF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Terminator View Post
    The only trouble with the NF is they are a big heavy scope for a 7mm mag the March is alot lighter and smaller in size. Personally I think the March has better glass than than NF but the NF will be better in low light.
    I'm interested in your thoughts on why the March will be better in low light (I have both and personally think the March is superior
    comparing 5.5x22x56 NF and 5 x 50 x56 March)

  12. #12
    Cutting Edge Bullets Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by DAF View Post
    I'm interested in your thoughts on why the March will be better in low light (I have both and personally think the March is superior
    comparing 5.5x22x56 NF and 5 x 50 x56 March)

    Like I said in another post above I was talking about the 2.5x25x42 March and the 5.5x22x56 NF. in low light
    I have not looked through a 5x50x56 March but going by your positive thoughts about it maybe I should be looking more seriously at it
    1000yds is fun, 1500yds is getting interesting, 2000yds is exciting, 2500yds will blow your mind

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!