Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Darkness


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 63
Like Tree107Likes

Thread: How heavy should a hunting rifle be?

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    456
    I'm thankful I weighed 115kg when I got sick. Or I would now likely be under 100kg, and that's an unpleasantly skinny weight for me. I have abs poking through at my current weight, which with my genetics means I'm getting to the point of underweight. I have a big set of thighs and a heap of muscle in my back from a few years of lifting (caused trouble with hospital procedures lol), and 110kg is about right.
    But I think I'll be alright with a bit of recoil, even though I'm a newbie.

  2. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Alps
    Posts
    4,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad S View Post
    I'm thankful I weighed 115kg when I got sick. Or I would now likely be under 100kg, and that's an unpleasantly skinny weight for me. I have abs poking through at my current weight, which with my genetics means I'm getting to the point of underweight. I have a big set of thighs and a heap of muscle in my back from a few years of lifting (caused trouble with hospital procedures lol), and 110kg is about right.
    But I think I'll be alright with a bit of recoil, even though I'm a newbie.
    Hope you get yr health problems sorted Brads,bit of hunting to be done yet.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    2,172
    I have never really understood why rifles are weighed 'bare'....those that carry a bare rifle keep the rest of the necessary shit in their pack?

  4. #34
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    22,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad S View Post
    I'm thankful I weighed 115kg when I got sick. Or I would now likely be under 100kg, and that's an unpleasantly skinny weight for me. I have abs poking through at my current weight, which with my genetics means I'm getting to the point of underweight. I have a big set of thighs and a heap of muscle in my back from a few years of lifting (caused trouble with hospital procedures lol), and 110kg is about right.
    But I think I'll be alright with a bit of recoil, even though I'm a newbie.
    you can download with NO PROBLEMS at all....not even slightly hard to make lower recoiling loads...either drop powder charge of projectile weight or both....
    its too easy to have a dual load set up..lighter loads for plinking or smaller stuff and some normal level loads incase something bigger pops out.
    plenty of us do it all the time anyway.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,967
    Sounds like you are mitigating a bunch of the rifle weight with scope choice.

    With your indicated by the time you have rings and a few round I'd expect. The carry weigh to be around 4.3 kg, which is heavy, but not crazily so. At that weight and at your size the recoil should be fine.

    Lots of the fancy custom rigs you see here with carbon fibre barrels & stocks are still up around 4 kg. My own fancy lr rig is about 3.8kg all up.

    Personally I love lighter rifles, and especially for a bush rifle as it is in you hand all day. The lighter gun is less likely to.get slung, and is just a pleasure in hand. My bush gun is 2.8 kg with suppressor, scope and a full mag. So nice to carry, and surprisingly accurate/capable.

    Also, hunting is recreation, and we all make little choices which are often weight sacrifices to make the process more enjoyable. Could be a book, a pillow, real food etc. If the rifle brings you a sense of enjoyment, then it's worth an extra kg

  6. #36
    Jus
    Jus is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    248
    Weight and caliber go hand in hand.. the less recoil the heavier the caliber can be, the more recoil the cartridge typically has, the more weight you will want, if you want to shoot consistently accurately that is. For bush stalking it doesn’t matter, go as light as possible because the rifle is always in your hands “ready to shoot”. I have a 7 prc that’s an ex 7 rem mag xbolt hells canyon. It’s borderline too light with a suppressor on it. Not that forgiving of a an average shooting position in the field, have to be fairly anal about getting setup behind the rifle or the recoil impulse effects the accuracy. Doesn’t help that it’s 20 inch barrel gives a bit of muzzle blast lol
    Snoppernator likes this.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    218
    Great thoughts here. I invested in a Sako carbon lite a few years ago, suppressed with Z3 Swaro scope. Weighs in at 3.1kg. Can carry it all day, whether in the mountains or bush hunting. Prefer the lighter kicking calibres, and the 7mm08 has been nice. I probably wouldn't want to go any lighter (rifle weight) to be honest, as the light stock and fluted barrel mean it will jump after fired. That's the thing with a lighter platform, but I'd much prefer this to carrying a heavier rifle in the mountains. I used to think a bipod was a waste of time, but on a light platform like this, I've found it really useful on long range shot set ups. Ironically I've gone 223 suppressed in a Browning Lever Action for the bush stuff, weighs in a 3.7kg. Can carry that all day, but boy the arms feel it toward days end. Love that rifle.
    Trout, Low box and Micky Duck like this.
    "Death - our community's number one killer"

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad S View Post
    I have found a very cool old wood and blued rifle that I want to buy for my first centrefire. It's a 30-06 and weighs about 3.6kg bare.
    Every one of my mates that I've sent it to has the opinion of "too big calibre and rifle too heavy"
    Do I need new mates, or are they right? I have decent legs and thought I'd be alright with a heavier older rifle? This post is not about the calibre, it's about rifle weight.
    Get a BSA CF2 in 270 then you would be able to lift railway iron much easier. Absolute pig of a rifle.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    Central South Island
    Posts
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad S View Post
    I should've searched this before posting. This subject has been beaten to death on here many times it seems. Apologies
    No need for apologies, regardless of whether its been beaten to death in the past, a lot of us still enjoy reading the posts and offering advice. A Sako, with a 3-10 sounds about bloody ideal to me. And then chambered in 30-06 and i would say you have a lifetime rifle right there. Look forward to another post from you telling us you have it in your hot little hands, and how it shoots.
    7mmsaum, erniec and Micky Duck like this.

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by Husky1600#2 View Post
    No need for apologies, regardless of whether its been beaten to death in the past, a lot of us still enjoy reading the posts and offering advice. A Sako, with a 3-10 sounds about bloody ideal to me. And then chambered in 30-06 and i would say you have a lifetime rifle right there. Look forward to another post from you telling us you have it in your hot little hands, and how it shoots.
    Thank you. I have not yet laid my hands on either the scope or the rifle. Will definitely post an update. Can't wait.
    Shearer and Husky1600#2 like this.

  11. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Otago
    Posts
    1,437
    30-06 is awesome. And a bit of weight in will help you shoot well. I'm looking forward to the update.
    Micky Duck, woods223 and Brad S like this.
    "The generalist hunter and angler is a well-fed mofo" - Steven Rinella

  12. #42
    Member Happy Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Nelson/Tasman
    Posts
    3,238
    My Savage model 16 in 22-250 weighs 4kg with a 3-9x40 scope, gunworks suppressor on a 20" barrel, magazine with 3 rounds (all it holds), bolt and sling. I don't consider it heavy.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  13. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    835
    Reading this thread made me go out and weigh a few rifles, all ready to go bang as it were. Bit surprised actually.
    308's vary from 3.4 to 3.91 kg. 223's 4.878 for night hunting rig and 4.073 for my main 'work' rifle. The work rifle could do with going on a diet but it carries well over an 8-10 hour day and shoots real good, almost as good as my departed AR which was a joy to use. My favourite 308 weighs 3.776 kg, is great to carry but can be a bit lively to shoot. Apart from the night rig, which is badly balanced and a bit of a pig to carry, all my rifles carry in hand well. if they didn't they'd be history. I'm 181cm tall / 85 kg's weight and don't have a problem carrying any of my rifles in hand for extended periods and a bit of weight sure makes for a steady shot, especially offhand and 'blowing' a bit.
    Having used a mates 30.06 quite a bit, which weighs about 4.1 kg's, I wouldn't want to go much lighter. It recoils with a bit of authority, especially with heavier loads.
    I'm a bit set in my ways but if 4kg's or there abouts is too heavy, harden the fuck up or get fitter. Just my 2c.
    Trout, GSP HUNTER, john m and 5 others like this.

  14. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by woods223 View Post
    I'm a bit set in my ways but if 4kg's or there abouts is too heavy, harden the fuck up or get fitter. Just my 2c.
    Haha thank you, appreciate it

  15. #45
    Member craigc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,179
    @Brad S

    Lighter rifles, to me, are like European binoculars; once you used them it’s hard to go back to lower grade gear.
    Like Ryan alluded to in his great use of sarcasm, above, my personal bench mark is a factory Tikka T3. I prefer something even lighter, so most of my rifles have carbon fibre stocks.
    I guess it comes down to how young and strong you are, all of us have most probably carried old wooden stocked heavy rifles around the hills, I just prefer light ones now.
    For reference, I’m in my 50’s and have finishing paying for everything my kids do. So I’m happy to spend a bit more on a hunting rifle, I also hunt at least once a week so find it easy to justify the extra cost 😀
    Puffin, kukuwai, TimC and 2 others like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. So when is a rifle too heavy?
    By 257weatherby in forum Hunting
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 18-10-2021, 05:25 PM
  2. Heavy scope, light rifle...crazy?
    By Sakoswarosorted in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 23-09-2019, 09:22 PM
  3. Fiordland diving and hunting (PHOTO HEAVY)
    By Nick.m in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-11-2012, 07:38 AM
  4. Great Easter Weekend Hunting.(photo heavy)
    By Malhunting in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 12:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!