Thread: The results are in

mm good to see both sides here at least

They also said they were sick of the time and money wasting going on because of only two members of the public’s worrying about a procedural mistake.

id hardly call the complete lack of consultation a procedural mistake and any idea that having it on the june agenda would have changed this past whateva the public at the meeting could have said is bollocks.
wonder if the lawyers and employment gag order costs are as big as a new election.
still if the electioneering attempted character assasination [via redacted emails and former councillers] and procedural failure can be swept aside then i guess a no hit no foul approach on the lack of consultation is nothing surprising.