Thread: Could it be so simple?

Originally Posted by stretch

So every hunter that shoots someone is inexperienced? How do YOU define (and differentiate) an experienced hunter from an inexperienced one? Once you've defined what an 'experienced' hunter is (time spent hunting? animals seen/shot?), does the act of mistakenly shooting a human revert the hunter back into the 'inexperienced' group?

To me, it seems like experience level and the ability to make lethal mistakes are not mutually exclusive and your logic that 'hunters that shoot hunters are not experienced' is flawed.

It may be flawed to you and that is fine. But it makes perfect sense to me.

Experience in hunting is not strictly a time or how many animals you have shot thing for me. It does help imo.

It is an idividuals decision and standards process that severely reduces the risks of these events happening.








Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk