Thread: Firearms ban in Western aussie

Originally Posted by Tahr

Its how the law lays. If people want to argue the Magna Carta and antiquated law they can go to it. This will be the result.

Flyblown is arguing compromise. The trouble with compromise is that you seldom get more than 50% of what you want.

Argue subjectivity laced with emotion and you will get nothing. Thats what I sometimes see as a theme in these threads.

Reasoned argument using facts and objectivity laced with dogged determination will be persuasive. NZDA in particular and maybe other organisation Im not familiar with seem to be getting this nowadays.

Sadly the Government argues using ‘may’ ‘possible’ and ‘might’ in their argument, just look at the WA authorities justification for banning those calibers.