Thread: Our gun laws

Eh I guess if I was a nut bag on a rampage with a bolt gun I'd just kill people slower.

It's all about perspective really. No semi autos might mean less killed in a school shooting or urban rampage. Take the same situation in an isolated rural community, where it might take the police a while to mobilize and sort it out, I doubt rate of fire would matter.

Realistically though, casualty rates would be irrelevant where kids are involved. I reckon if a school shootin occurs we would be totally fucked regardless of firearm type.

Enjoy what you can own while you can own it.

Originally Posted by Beavis

Enjoy what you can own while you can own it.

Pretty much. I think they just don't like firearm enthusiasts (us) owning 'military style semi's' at all. American laws slowly but surely seem to be creeping closer & closer to home turf.

As for mass shootings, this was interesting, the news tonight told us that the Sister of one of the teachers who died at Sandy Hook 2 years ago is suing Bushmaster for the massacre...

**Face-palm**

Originally Posted by Sasquatch

Pretty much. I think they just don't like firearm enthusiasts (us) owning 'military style semi's' at all. American laws slowly but surely seem to be creeping closer & closer to home turf.

As for mass shootings, this was interesting, the news tonight told us that the Sister of one of the teachers who died at Sandy Hook 2 years ago is suing Bushmaster for the massacre...

**Face-palm**

Yea like suing a brand in a huge investment group is going to actually achieve anything. Not only will the courts slap it down harder than a pimp in Harlem, but really, unless they are gold digging, what could they possibly do to a company that will just offload more of their shit products for cheap at Brownells to pay for it. It could set a precedent judgement for more people to sue America gun companies, but really, their argument is fucking retarded.

Originally Posted by Beavis

Yea like suing a brand in a huge investment group is going to actually achieve anything. Not only will the courts slap it down harder than a pimp in Harlem, but really, unless they are gold digging, what could they possibly do to a company that will just offload more of their shit products for cheap at Brownells to pay for it. It could set a precedent judgement for more people to sue America gun companies, but really, their argument is fucking retarded.

Yeah it's a bit of a joke really, I mean yes, I do feel sorry for her. Very tragic and a great loss to the people of Sandy Hook. But lets say Adam Lanzer drove in to the school with a Toyota Prius & ran all those kids down... Would she be suing Toyota for it??

My gut tells me no. The agenda is too apparent, they want those guns. Her & her lawyer made it clear in the snippet interview they want those evil "assault" weapons banned from society. Even though they were told by the news correspondent that less then 1% of crime in the States is committed with semi autos...

**Sigh**