Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: Breaking in the 260rem and load development

  1. #16
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,284
    Bloody odd this, 6.5's generally shoot bloody good regardless of what you throw in them, especially 6.5CM & 260. I've always found you are trying to improve on the 3 shot 0.75 MOA that they usually produce straight up.
    rewa likes this.

  2. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    2,719
    Greetings again @Sidetrack,
    You may know the standard test for bedding but just in case here it is. With the action snugged down in the stock hold the barrel and fore end with one hand and loosen the front action screw. You should not feel any movement between the barrel and fore end. Do the same thing with the rear screw and the tang and stock. Once again there should be no movement between the tang and stock. If you feel movement then strip the rifle and remove the mag well which is just a loose fit between the action and floor plate. Reassemble and test again. If there is movement with the mag well in and none with it out then the mag well is binding or is too big for its space. It is possible that the action is hung up somewhere in its recess on the underside of the action so make sure that there are no rough edges on the top of the well. You can test the rifle with the well out if you like. To me this is the most likely problem with a dud scope right behind. Action screws that are too long or crud in their holes are possible as well.
    Best of luck, Grandpamac.
    rewa and Sidetrack like this.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Catlins
    Posts
    384
    Loverly morning here so took some me time to catch on the 260 progress. Had already gone through the above checks, thanks GPM, and found nothing untoward so as it’s a perfect range day here, and before I toss the scope, ran 2 x 3 shot groups with some Hornady factory 129SST’s which I found in Invers last year.
    They are a reasonably spicy load but like the Corelokts, about 6” high. To test the scope, I dropped 20 clicks and shot the next three. Tracked spot on and while the group is nothing to write home about, it’s consistent so will now crack on with load development.

    Name:  3FCF21BF-8539-459C-9756-5AF6A48023E5.jpeg
Views: 307
Size:  827.4 KBName:  A61DA093-A8A2-4A34-BB53-CE8D72D4066F.jpeg
Views: 299
Size:  505.6 KBName:  5F7A94E4-4FAE-4AC7-868F-661C1E9E674B.jpeg
Views: 364
Size:  3.18 MB
    “Age is a very high price to pay for maturity”

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    National park.
    Posts
    146
    Make sure you haven't or aren't about to run out of windage clicks on your scope,had a bit of drama with my 260 a wee while back with a replacement scope and new rings,was doubting scope but worked out I had run out of windage via the Leupols site and was scattering rounds like yours l.Then found out the rings were not true by placing some straight pipe in them and comparing to barrel,well out!.Changed rings to true ones,recentered windagef,sighted in and all good,the faulty rings were Leupolds too.
    rewa likes this.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Timaru
    Posts
    961
    Sing out if you need any brass i have enough now and can spare some.
    rewa and Sidetrack like this.

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Catlins
    Posts
    384
    It’s been awhile since last update but have not long got this rifle back from the gunsmith. A number of niggly issues had to be resolved before I got on with load development.
    Inspecting the brass after the last range outing, I had noticed that the shoulder was showing quite pronounced marking. Quick look down the chamber showed some pretty average machining with the shoulder heavily grooved. Not exactly Trueflite’s best work I would imagine but I guess the odd one slips through occasionally and it was a few years ago now.

    Name:  20230815_120633_Original.jpeg
Views: 171
Size:  248.2 KB

    Decided to have that tidied up, the feed issue sorted, barrel threaded for a suppressor, trigger adjusted, and a confirmation that the bedding was all good to go. This rifle was also destined to receive some decent optics, for my benefit as well, so lashed out on a Burris HD Signature E3 3-15x44. Even though it’s hardly high end, was damn near a $1000 more than I’d ever spent on scope!!! I think my butt’s finally stopped squeaking now
    So, all systems go. Slotted it into a set of Talley lows I had, looks good, sits nicely on the rifle so happy as. Got it close to where I wanted it and nipped it up. Mounted the rifle a couple of three times to check fit and bugger!! too low, went to cycle the bolt and no, contacts the scope mid handle. That I could sort with a bit of minor grinding but the eye line is just too low. She’ll need a set of mediums and I’m back to parking it in the safe. I really should divorce the bitch but I still love her so I’ll continue to stroke her gently in the continued hope she’ll start cooperating and let me get the best out of her. Some long range shooting is calling and the weather is on the improve.
    “Age is a very high price to pay for maturity”

  7. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Fielding-ish
    Posts
    561
    Don't discount 120-gr projos , some .260's and 6.5's love them and within their useage-range/conditions etc they absolutely flatten deer often expanding better than 140's . An early True-Flight job on one of my 6.5-rifles (many years back before it changed-hands ) was an utter crappy disaster , hopefully yours works-out ok

  8. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Catlins
    Posts
    384
    Thank you, my thoughts were tracking that way. I’m going to start with 129gn SST’s as I have plenty but was building up a stock of 120-123gn’s for the Grendal so will be good to be able to share across both platforms if it works out that way.
    “Age is a very high price to pay for maturity”

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 168 TMK in 308 load development
    By Backsteaks in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 26-08-2021, 09:08 PM
  2. My first load development
    By Remmodel7 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-06-2021, 02:55 PM
  3. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  4. 300 Wsm Load development
    By mcche171 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-05-2019, 03:22 PM
  5. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!