Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 91
Like Tree250Likes

Thread: Long-range hunting: is it sporting?

  1. #16
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,745
    Quote Originally Posted by sako75 View Post
    Whether it is 6m or 600m is still an execution shot
    Ethics are whether once you have made the LR shot are you going to go the distance and recover the meat
    Ethics are, are you doing everything you can to ensure a clean humane kill...whatever the range and tool used to do the job......I have tracked more than a couple of poorly bow shot deer shot at less than 30y for hours. (not my shooting)
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  2. #17
    Member sako75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Supercity
    Posts
    4,945
    Sorry VC I took the humane part as a given
    Seen a mate stalking a hind and due to angle and piss poor performance shot it in the jaw
    He was horrified. We tracked it for quite some time but lost out. Something he didn't take lightly

  3. #18
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,745
    Quote Originally Posted by sako75 View Post
    Sorry VC I took the humane part as a given
    Seen a mate stalking a hind and due to angle and piss poor performance shot it in the jaw
    He was horrified. We tracked it for quite some time but lost out. Something he didn't take lightly
    I have witnessed that too.
    I never recommend a head shot, neck is a far better option imo.
    Steve123 likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  4. #19
    Fulla
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cni
    Posts
    1,660
    After the airport today, it's probably best to tranculize it, And just get fish and chips.
    Everyone else has said the rest, anything more than sharp finger nails is just plain unfair.
    Much like giving a burglar a bit of excessive force, it's just unfair, he only wants to rob you.

  5. #20
    Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Central NI
    Posts
    5,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    I have yet to head butt a rabbit to death, so I guess the answer lies somewhere in the middle.
    Yep...classic.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Dan M

  6. #21
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    8,886
    Welcome to 2007. Don't buy real estate this year.

  7. #22
    The Original Striker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    697
    I think while we are at it, we should ban boats, motors, burley, fish finders it just takes so much of the sportingness out of fishing,
    hell even bait and hooks is unfair to the poor fishys
    mikee and 223nut like this.
    Bigger Better Faster Stronger
    Handle the Jandle, or get off the Beach

    The Original Striker

  8. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    632
    Long range is ok if you know your limitations, But I do see a trend to people wanting to shoot further, yet they want cheap scopes, the cheapest ammo, have know idea how to estimate distance, everyone I know shoots .22 rimfire to 100+ meters , deer at 400+ accurately everyday , yet when asked how wide our shop is will say 50,60mtrs, when it's only 32 where they are standing.
    Garret, shooternz and Tim Dicko like this.

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    11,852
    The Editors of Hunting & Wildlife really do need to move along some of these old hack writers that they keep recycling, and encourage some new and more modernly enlightened scribes.

    I get a bit sick of a last millennium perspective on "ethics", and dated/homespun articles about firearms.

  10. #25
    Rabbit Herder StrikerNZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    South Canterbury
    Posts
    1,768
    There's only the one editor, and I don't know if he's actually a hunter, more just a semi-professional free-lance editor.

    Have seen some terrible choice of stories included in the mag over the years.. like the one several years ago about a queenstown lakes branch president who, after a new hunter/member had told him about a good stag and shown him photos in a spot he recognised, while declaring his intention to have another crack at it when he had a chance. Said president then took an afternoon off work next chance he got ("Didn't have time to invite the new member along") and went and shot the stag for himself......

    Or the one in the current edition with the chap poaching lilybank station.....


    I must admit, I only really read the mag these days when I've been told about a particular story, or on the couple of occasions I've had a story in, to see how carved up it has become... (Hut improvements, not ethics... don't worry)
    mikee likes this.

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,030
    Then how far is too far?
    As said above too many people with limited practice/ equipment / knowledge try to beat the latest shooting distance from the mate/ magazine/ now TV and Internet shows.
    Once I talked to a guy who was telling me how he was using his magnum rifle to shoot deer at 500 or 600 yards.
    I asked him what brand off rangefinders he was using? " nah, I don't need any of these " was his answer.

    And with the increased used of Facebook , forums ...etc to show how great one person is, often not showing how the hard work was done to get there, it becomes a simple shortcut in the mind of the watcher: ie , go to the shop , get a rifle/scope/ ammo, sight it in and good to go. For the distance shoot , some might buy a rangefinder and/ or just aim high...
    What I just said here, is illustrated by the number of people coming to hunting thinking that within a few hours walk in the bush they ll nail their first deer and bring back home the bacon. As it doesn't not happen often like that, and after a few unsuccessful trip they hang up the rifle and abandon the idea of hunting.and their rifle is for sale on trademe.

    Same brain shortcut applies to those who want to tackle long range shooting and get the idea or told that a magnum rifle is the way to go. Fine, they buy that big loodenbloomer and some get a bit of a shock at the recoil. For those who don't persevere, the rifle is on trademe with a short rounds count.
    And a good number of us know how many rounds it can take to sight in the thing, develop a proper load , verify ballistic tables on the terrain, practice with it, practice with it again, shoot a few things, and if we fail once rethink the whole process again( if you are ethical that is ;-)

    I believe that if a distance of say 30 m for bowhunting and 150 to 250 m for rifles was recommended to the beginner or the average hunter ,it was that beyond those ranges there was great risk of wounding and lousing game.i know technology has evolved and allows us to reach further, fine, shoot to within your ability and know when to say "STOP, I won't take this shot because it is not right and I might wound the animal". Doing otherwise is criminal, unrespectfull and unethical .

    I think we also engage into hunting ( or fishing/ skydiving/ racing...whatever floats your boat)for the sensations it brings us.
    If I pick up my bow this year for the roar, it is because I don't get those sensations with a rifle anymore.
    I use a rifle to put meat on the table, or shoot at a distant varmint or print small groups on a paper target or make ring a gong.
    But again, for me, it does not bring the level of sensations that I get when I am close to an animal with a bow.

    Each to their own, and KNOW your limits. The game we chase deserves it.
    gadgetman, Scouser, Gerbs and 4 others like this.

  12. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    24
    Did hunting ever start out to be sporting? We as humans have decided to add that word to it and with that flows many different interpretations. These many different interpretations are the only issue for me. I personally still hunt for meat and I will use every method in my arsenal including long range hunting. Many that don't like it either can't do it or have never tried or perfected it. Like all forms of hunting you need to master your skills. Poor skills lead to poor results, distance has nothing to do with it IMO.
    SlowElliot likes this.

  13. #28
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    The Editors of Hunting & Wildlife really do need to move along some of these old hack writers that they keep recycling, and encourage some new and more modernly enlightened scribes.

    I get a bit sick of a last millennium perspective on "ethics", and dated/homespun articles about firearms.
    I believe it starts at the top with this organisation. Very archaic in their ways for a 21st century time period......

  14. #29
    Gone................. mikee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Nelson, New Zealand
    Posts
    9,647
    Personally if I am being "sporting" I will be taking a camera. "Eating" on the other hand is different any method is OK with me as long as The "end" for the animal is quick and unexpected.
    Mathias, SlowElliot and Frodo like this.
    All those with dogs waiting no longer fear death. Those with many dogs waiting even welcome it in it's time.

  15. #30
    Member gadgetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    17,850
    Could it be considered that longer range is more ethical? It gives a better chance to assess the animal, and fully identify it, and decide whether to take it or not. I suspect fewer friends get shot with longer range.
    There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Long range hunting
    By BRADS in forum Hunting
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-02-2015, 03:34 PM
  2. Long Range Hunting Course
    By Simon 01 in forum Hunting
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 28-04-2014, 06:51 PM
  3. Long Range Hunting Course
    By Simon 01 in forum Shooting
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 26-04-2014, 04:40 PM
  4. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 15-03-2012, 10:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!