WRT shooting so as to frighten or offend, if a case arrives in court without a fixed definition then the test is "what would a reasonable person think". This is where it gets messy, as we are a minority here in NZ (I'm talking about hunters, not reasonable people), and over time the familiarity of Joe Average with firearms has diminished. I've not heard of anyone who was a hunter rather than a dickhead with a rifle ending up in court over this - has anybody any examples, and how did it play out?
That said, the NZ public lands (DOC estate/Crown land, call it what you want) have been hunted pretty much as long as they have existed as a legal concept, so it is not unreasonable to think there may be shooting there or thereabouts. In an area with a high concentration of animals it would be even more likely. I sometimes hunt around the Waihohonu on the round the mountain track (Ruapehu) which is a VERY heavily used great walk track, and have never had anything other than positive interactions with people I meet. I spent a couple of nights in the Oturere hut with a visiting American and we had all manner of people wanting to talk and understand what we were hunting, where, the rules around bla, bla bla, and all very positive.




360Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks