Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 180
Like Tree258Likes

Thread: Educate me on bushpigs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member craigc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,302
    Quote Originally Posted by northdude View Post
    i just think its a dumb name to call a carbine kind of like reinventing the wheel and giving it a new name
    It was a commercial decision, designed to make a lot of money, and it has! Have you seen their price list?

    Good on them too!

  2. #2
    sneakywaza I got
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Fairlie
    Posts
    3,644
    Not forgetting of course, that using a suppressor helps to not overly disturb other game animals or stock in adjacent gullies, I have a rifle that will never be suppressed and I have no drama shooting an animal in open country with it, would have muffs on if target/gong shooting though. I like having a suppressor on (my current favorite hunting rifle, .243 18" shorty) , but only on a shorter barrel, quite apart from how odd it looks on a long barrel, they just balance and carry better short.
    GWH and Max Headroom like this.

  3. #3
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,300
    Yes damage is still done to the hearing even when using a suppressor BUT not to the same level.. my ears will ring from a bare rifle and is quite uncomfortable. I’m only 24 and have hearing damage from growing up hunting with traditional rifles.. all my rifles are suppressed now except a traditional Sako 243 that I keep looking traditional. If you substitute a suppressor for elec earmuffs then that’s a good way to attack the problem but then what about your mate beside you or the dog you are shooting directly over top of? Or the gully just over the rise holding animals? I have had animals 100metres away not be spooked by my suppressed 7mm08 with the way it captured the sound in the space I was in. Yes a lever type gun will do the same short thing without modification.. but again, loud! and short range. A short suppressed 308, 7mm08 etc is still capable of taking shots to 3 - 400. My new short rifle is a 284 with 17” barrel. The places I generally hunt even when bushstalking will provide the opportunity to take a shot at 400. With my suppressed rifle I can do that. With a lever gun I don’t think so.
    6x47 and Micky Duck like this.

  4. #4
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,565
    Browning BLR being the exception to the rule.......and YES I have hunted and shot deer with one recently and YES it was suppressed,suppressor fitted snug up to forestock and added only a couple of inches to overall length,was much more pleasant to shoot.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    1,250
    "but in my book ear protection is a pain in the arse when bush hunting"

    If hearing protection in the bush is a "pain in the arse" and "useless", and suppressors won't actually prevent your hearing from deteriorating - then what is the solution? Isn't it then a matter of compromise?

    a) Do I choose not to wear hearing protection (whether the rifle is suppressed or not) and accept that my aural health will inevitably worsen...

    b) Do I wear hearing protection, but accept that I may not be as efficient in the bush as I would like to be...

    Suppressing a rifle may be a solution to "quite a few issues", and I agree that this is their main selling point. But we're not discussing their other benefits - we're discussing protecting our hearing. And suppressors, while a viable complimentary aid to ear muffs/earplugs (however negligible), aren't sufficient on their own.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Quakechurch
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by Frodo View Post
    "but in my book ear protection is a pain in the arse when bush hunting"

    If hearing protection in the bush is a "pain in the arse" and "useless", and suppressors won't actually prevent your hearing from deteriorating - then what is the solution? Isn't it then a matter of compromise?

    a) Do I choose not to wear hearing protection (whether the rifle is suppressed or not) and accept that my aural health will inevitably worsen...

    b) Do I wear hearing protection, but accept that I may not be as efficient in the bush as I would like to be...

    Suppressing a rifle may be a solution to "quite a few issues", and I agree that this is their main selling point. But we're not discussing their other benefits - we're discussing protecting our hearing. And suppressors, while a viable complimentary aid to ear muffs/earplugs (however negligible), aren't sufficient on their own.

    Well actually we are discussing "bushpigs" which to my way of thinking means suppressed and short barrel rifles. You must have got lost, this isn't a hearing protection thread.

    So yes we are discussing the other benefits of suppressors. One of which is additional protection from hearing loss. A 30DB reduction reduces noise to 1/8 of its unsuppressed effect. To not understand the significance of that in terms of reduced risk seems rather superficial.

    Again, suppressors reduce damage and risk, they don't eliminate it. You get to make the call on what strategy you employ to mitigate risk or damage.

    But I am sick of those "suppressors don't save your hearing" lines when the next one is, I use my 30/30 in the bush unsuppressed, but its not that often so its OK..

    What I know is that firing a shot out a suppressed rifle in the bush, doesn't make my ears ring when an unsuppressed rifle does - with just a single shot.

    And that is a positive outcome for having an ugly rifle with a stupid name and a suppressor permanently attached...

    Name:  IMG_5359.jpg
Views: 616
Size:  3.93 MB
    camo wsm likes this.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    1,250

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidney View Post
    Well actually we are discussing "bushpigs" which to my way of thinking means suppressed and short barrel rifles. You must have got lost, this isn't a hearing protection thread.

    So yes we are discussing the other benefits of suppressors. One of which is additional protection from hearing loss. A 30DB reduction reduces noise to 1/8 of its unsuppressed effect. To not understand the significance of that in terms of reduced risk seems rather superficial.

    Again, suppressors reduce damage and risk, they don't eliminate it. You get to make the call on what strategy you employ to mitigate risk or damage.

    But I am sick of those "suppressors don't save your hearing" lines when the next one is, I use my 30/30 in the bush unsuppressed, but its not that often so its OK..

    What I know is that firing a shot out a suppressed rifle in the bush, doesn't make my ears ring when an unsuppressed rifle does - with just a single shot.

    And that is a positive outcome for having an ugly rifle with a stupid name and a suppressor permanently attached...

    Attachment 98688

    The rifle in the photo with the coral/sea sponge pattern: it just looks like an ordinary suppressed rifle. I don't think it deserves the honourable title of 'bushpig'? Maybe if you chopped a few more inches off it? As of now, it looks more like a wannabe bushpig.


  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Quakechurch
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by Frodo View Post
    The rifle in the photo with the coral/sea sponge pattern: it just looks like an ordinary suppressed rifle. I don't think it deserves the honourable title of 'bushpig'? Maybe if you chopped a few more inches off it? As of now, it looks more like a wannabe bushpig.

    Well looks might be deceiving - It has a 16.5inch barrel and the stock forend is shorter than most. As setup it is a 22" overall barrel length with suppressor on it. The can is 80mm back and 150mm forward and it is that way to enable it to be used in a MDT ESS chassis with a 12" forend.

    I might end up using another can on it for bush work at 80mm forward and 150mm back. That will end up at <20" overall barrel length with suppressor and the gap between stock and can will be small.

    Is it just the small gap that makes it a bush pig do you think? Or is it the overall length?
    Last edited by Sidney; 13-11-2018 at 12:40 PM.
    Frodo likes this.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    1,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidney View Post
    Well looks might be deceiving - It has a 16.5inch barrel and the stock forend is shorter than most. As setup it is a 22" overall barrel length with suppressor on it. The can is 80mm back and 150mm forward and it is that way to enable it to be used in a MDT ESS chassis with a 12" forend.

    I might end up using another can on it for bush work at 80mm forward and 150mm back. That will end up at <20" overall barrel length with suppressor and the gap between stock and can will be small.

    Is it just the small gap that makes it a bush pig do you think? Or is it the overall length?
    It's got nothing to do with looks or genetic predisposition. If your rifle "feels" like a bushpig, that's all that matters.

  10. #10
    Member Bonecrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    1,149
    Name:  17b5d981d22f7dc5438be55659ddb11f.jpg
Views: 1007
Size:  40.2 KB

    Waikato Bush Pig

  11. #11
    Bus driver
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Porirua/Whangateau
    Posts
    3,708
    ....and you would definitely need a couple of boxes of Waikato to “slay” this.....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonecrusher View Post
    Attachment 98684

    Waikato Bush Pig
    Micky Duck likes this.
    It's not the mountain we conquer,but ourselves.....Sir Edmund Hillary

  12. #12
    northdude
    Guest
    Id eat it 😣

  13. #13
    Bus driver
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Porirua/Whangateau
    Posts
    3,708
    Barring all other comments and opinions(stated as fact(s)),I find this to be true myself!


    Quote..What I know is that firing a shot out a suppressed rifle in the bush, doesn't make my ears ring when an unsuppressed rifle does - with just a single shot.
    GWH, 6x47, Micky Duck and 1 others like this.
    It's not the mountain we conquer,but ourselves.....Sir Edmund Hillary

  14. #14
    Bus driver
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Porirua/Whangateau
    Posts
    3,708
    .... honey,get me some popcorn
    cameronjackwhite likes this.
    It's not the mountain we conquer,but ourselves.....Sir Edmund Hillary

  15. #15
    MSL
    MSL is offline
    Member MSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    6,531
    14.5” 308. Owned the same rifle unsuppressed before this one, and it was a dog to shoot.
    gadgetman, Gibo and Been Upto like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Educate me on rangefinders
    By res in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-08-2018, 01:05 AM
  2. 15x56mm Binoculars - please educate me!
    By Gillie in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24-01-2018, 09:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!