Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Gunworks Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 20
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: Question on my first AR.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Jexla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by MaW View Post
    Thanks MrDrifter, I need it ecat for multigun, i.e. the magazines and can only see stocks I want in ecat as well.

    I wont have to put an acat stock on it too often, just for the kids and hopefully not an onerous exercise to do so once a month or so..

    Thanks
    Doesn't matter if you change the stock, it's still registered as E cat therefore no one else can legally shoot it.
    Skatieguy likes this.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    Doesn't matter if you change the stock, it's still registered as E cat therefore no one else can legally shoot it.
    Actually that is incorrect.

    Having it "registered" as an E cat merely permits you to have it in MSSA configuration. There is no requirement for it to have all or any of the 'bits' that make an MSSA or remain in that configuration.

    Once you remove the MSSA features it ceases to be a MSSA.

    It will be required to be "de-registered" in order to sell it as an A category firearm.
    Savage1 likes this.

  3. #3
    Member Jexla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Koshogi View Post
    Actually that is incorrect.

    Having it "registered" as an E cat merely permits you to have it in MSSA configuration. There is no requirement for it to have all or any of the 'bits' that make an MSSA or remain in that configuration.

    Once you remove the MSSA features it ceases to be a MSSA.

    It will be required to be "de-registered" in order to sell it as an A category firearm.
    No matter it's configuration full stop, if it's registered as an E cat firearm no one but the endorsed person can legally shoot it. It's as simple as that.

    Like 300CALMAN said, we don't care, it's a stupid law.

    Was just making sure you were aware as to not let someone who might care for no good reason know.

  4. #4
    MaW
    MaW is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    Was just making sure you were aware as to not let someone who might care for no good reason know.
    Appreciated, we are on the same page.

    Also managed to find someone with both an upper and lower aero in stock so I nabbed them. Tick one thing off the list.

    Thank!

  5. #5
    res
    res is offline
    Member res's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    3,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post

    Like 300CALMAN said, we don't care, it's a stupid law.
    A stupid law that Joe Green once told me no one had ever been charged with braking even though I have seen it broken in front of him
    Using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    No matter it's configuration full stop, if it's registered as an E cat firearm no one but the endorsed person can legally shoot it. It's as simple as that.
    There is no such legal thing as a "registered E Cat".

    The Arms Act only refers to the transfer or possession of MSSAs, not for the transfer or possession of "registered E Cats".

    A MSSA is defined as:

    Arms Act 1983
    2 Interpretation

    military style semi-automatic firearm means a firearm (other than a pistol) that is—
    (a) a semi-automatic firearm having 1 or more of the following features:
    (i) a folding or telescopic butt:
    (ii) a magazine designed to hold 0.22-inch rimfire cartridges that—
    (A) is capable of holding more than 15 cartridges; or
    (B) is detachable, and by its appearance indicates that it is capable of holding more than 15 cartridges:
    (iii) a magazine (other than one designed to hold 0.22-inch rimfire cartridges) that—
    (A) is capable of holding more than 7 cartridges; or
    (B) is detachable, and by its appearance indicates that it is capable of holding more than 10 cartridges:
    (iv) bayonet lugs:
    (v) a flash suppressor:
    (vi) a component of a kind defined or described by an order under section 74A as a pistol grip for the purposes of this definition; or
    (b) a semi-automatic firearm of a make and model declared by an order under section 74A to be a military style semi-automatic firearm for the purposes of this Act; or
    (c) a semi-automatic firearm of a description declared by an order under section 74A to be a military style semi-automatic firearm for the purposes of this Act; or
    (d) a semi-automatic firearm that has a feature of a kind defined or described in an order under section 74A as a feature of military style semi-automatic firearms for the purposes of this Act


    If the firearm does not possess any of those features, it by definition, is not a MSSA. It is a firearm.

    The law no longer requires that firearms or MSSAs remain in that configuration "at all times".

    The third flaw is that the definition of ‘sporting configuration’ has been removed. Under the old law, a semi automatic firearm was either a MSSA or in sporting configuration.

    These two physical feature configurations were ‘locked in’ by the phrase ‘at all times.’

    With the demise of ‘sporting configuration at all times’, a MSSA rifle can now be removed from it’s legal definition by simply taking off the parts that constitute the defined physical features.


    Arms Act changes flawed folly - stuff-nation | Stuff.co.nz

    So where is the restriction on using a 'registered E Cat" under the supervision of a licence holder in the Arms Act?

    Support your claim/interpretation.
    Savage1 likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 284 win question
    By camo wsm in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 19-01-2016, 11:15 PM
  2. Question
    By BushHunter in forum Questions, Comments, Suggestions, Testing.
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2015, 10:43 PM
  3. another e cat question
    By northdude in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16-06-2015, 01:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!