Thread: WE LOST

Originally Posted by Cordite

Ahem, @res... methinks I hear ye ghostly echo of @ryancairns and his "verily-no-firearm-that-copper-saith-so!" pinfire import saga.

HaHaHa Ha, I can see where your coming from but there is worlds of diferance (at least in my mind) between published police policy with decades of import permits issued and a one off conversaion.

Break-open guns are irrelevant, the key word is "break". It can not be fired in its broken-open state.

nore can lots of guns with folding stocks-including one version of the test gun in this case. I very much hope your right though-but dont think its a given. We really need to wait for more info.

NZ Police are of course at fault, what with changing lines of advice etc. etc. don't get me wrong on this, but still, here is my legal opinion on the merits of the court case:

Attachment 99319

Only outstanding question is, why does this make me think of @gadgetman?

go go gadget legs?

end of the day I dont really care how this case plays out as long as we end up with a clear way fwd- Ill weild some stocks and replace parts on some others and it will only leave me with one rifle that will have to become C or preferably B, as long as no stupid wording catches other stuff out