Thread: Anti-1080 protester has firearms licence revoked after delivering threatening letter

Originally Posted by systolic

What evidence has been provided? Why should anything be provided to anyone other than the people directly involved?

Or should the guy's licence be given back, or not, on the basis of media reports and the opinions of those, including me, that know fuck-all about the case?

That was exactly my point, go back and read my post again.

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

That was exactly my point, go back and read my post again.

I read your post.

My post is directed at anyone who makes their decisions based on conjecture rather than facts.






And your 'feeling' that his licence was taken for being a pain the the council's arse is a wee bit of a stretch (I feel).

Originally Posted by systolic

I read your post.

My post is directed at anyone who makes their decisions based on conjecture rather than facts.

I have not made any decisions and openly stated my post and all the others are nothing more than conjecture...you have trouble with reading and comprehension?






And your 'feeling' that his licence was taken for being a pain the the council's arse is a wee bit of a stretch (I feel).

As I said...on the evidence we have been provided(eg none, a shitty stuff article) that is the feeling I get.
Stuff is wrong and or inaccurate more often than it is factual generally which is why I made the comment "on the evidence provided"